1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murljashka [212]
3 years ago
15

“If a nation is attacked the only recourse is to attack back” Agree or disagree and why?

History
2 answers:
WARRIOR [948]3 years ago
6 0

Not by any means,  since many things might be and have to be weighted before such an important decision that interferes with so many lives.

It is dependent on the force of the assault just as the intensity of the assaulting country.  

Also, it is important to remember that quite a few nations have been assaulted and actually never battled back. In fact, surrendering has been proven an option that might actually save more lives in many situations. Specially if you consider that the country that is assaulting might be the more dominant when it comes to be about fire power.

There is also the option of trying to punish an specific responsible by it or using of sanctions when it's the case of no human casualties and so on.

LUCKY_DIMON [66]3 years ago
4 0
Not really,

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
 some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
 
You might be interested in
In a country with limited government:
Bogdan [553]
Yes. What else u should write it
7 0
3 years ago
Tell me about the aquasistion of florida.
kherson [118]

Answer:

Secretary of government John Quincy Adams came to a diplomatic coup in 1819 after years of negotiations, with the signing of the Florida Purchase Treaty which formally placed Florida on US hands at no expense over and above U.S. assumption of some $5 million in US public debt claims against Spain.

Explanation:

Is it cool if I can have brainliest again

Hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Lincoln’s intentions in relation to slavery change from the beginning of the war to the end?
tester [92]

Answer:

At the outset of the Civil War, President Lincoln had not spoken out specifically on issues relating to slavery, but on the contrary, had established that abolition of slavery was not one of the mainstays of the Union, but the maintenance of national unity.

Now, as the years and battles progressed, this position was mutating, and in 1863 President Lincoln made his Emancipation Proclamation, by which he freed all the African-American slaves that were in the southern states that were falling into the hands of the Union, urging in turn that they join the northern cause.

Thus, through these types of policies, President Lincoln was including slaves and abolitionists within his political position, leaving the Confederation in ideological check.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the ruling in the supreme court case of yick wo v. hopkins?the court ruled that chinese americans did not enjoy the sam
ASHA 777 [7]
N 1880, San Fransisco enacted an ordinance that required all laundry businesses had to be in buildings that were made of stone or brick. If they wanted to have a laundry that was in a wooden building, they needed to get permission from the board of supervisors. Due to challenges in other employment areas, Chinese immigrants often worked in or owned laundromats. In fact, 89% of San Fransisco's laundry businesses were operated by workers of Chinese descent.

The board of supervisors began granting whites permission to have laundry businesses in wooden buildings but didn't grant permission to Chinese immigrants. Those that violated this ordinance had to pay a fine. Yick Wo was an operator for 22 years in San Fransisco. He did not have a permit and refused to pay the fine. Wo was arrested and convicted. He then appealed his conviction, saying that the law was discriminating against him because of his race. The court ruled that he was still protected under the 14th Amendment and dismissed all charges. Looking at the background for this case and the ruling, the best answer choice would be that the court ruled that Chinese Americans were able to operate laundry facilities, just as native-born citizens could. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Henry Ford increase the production and sale of automobiles?
marusya05 [52]
Henry Ford increased the production and sale of automobiles by introducing an assembly line and low prices.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Reason why both women and man could become victims of violence
    9·2 answers
  • This is my World Religions class. I am learning about Judaism. I cant anything about this anywhere! Its a true or false question
    12·1 answer
  • If you had come to the New World how would you have survived? Give at least two examples of ways you could have lived off the la
    14·1 answer
  • OPEN ENDED QUESTION
    11·2 answers
  • What was Francis Bacon was convinced of
    5·2 answers
  • Violation of the terms of this act could lead to
    15·1 answer
  • Because of her reform activities, which group would not have supported rebecca latimer felton? (1 point)
    8·1 answer
  • Your teacher explains that all Americans are patriotic. Based on the information you’ve learned in class, you feel the teacher i
    5·2 answers
  • (EASY POINTS)<br>Who was our 5th president?
    12·2 answers
  • The Sahel is located on the blank edge of the Sahara Desert.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!