Answer: the georgia general assembly immediately implented it
Explanation:
A person who feels very good after receiving a compliment, but very bad after being insulted, would sore high on measures of
<u> "self-esteem variability".</u>
The connection of self-esteem variability to identity, state of mind, and conduct was explored. Self-esteem variability was estimated by figuring the standard deviation of self-appraisals made amid seven days of experience-examining. Members high in self-esteem variability were reluctant, socially on edge, and avoidant of social settings. Confidence fluctuation was mostly free of the theoretically comparative attribute of affect-intensity.
Answer:
In some cases (for example, that of the Talensi), an independent community or chiefdom was aware that others like it shared the same culture and social structure, and there were occasional common rituals that brought independent communities together. In other cases (for example, the Dagaba), political and cultural boundaries were not sharp, and there was no sense that an ethnic group included some communities and excluded others, although shifting distinctions were made based on various cultural traits. In the case of the Dagaba, the most important or recurrent of these distinctions seemed to be, and in the mid-twentieth century continued to be, whether inheritance was exclusively determined in the patrilineal line or, at least in part, followed the matrilineal line.
Explanation:
I hope this helps :)
The answer is “food tampering”.
Tampering can allude to numerous types of treachery
yet the term is regularly used to mean deliberate modification of
items in a way that would make them destructive to the purchaser. This risk has
provoked makers to make items that are either hard to change or if nothing else
hard to adjust without notifying the customer.
The answer to this question is socialization :)
