If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.
Answer:
Alex- $40,000
Brad- $30,000
Carl- $30,000
Explanation:
For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.
Step 1: Add the ratios
i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10
Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula
(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000
For Alex, we have
(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.4 × $100,000
= $40,000
For Brad, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
For Carl, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.
Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.
i hope this helps
The most viable target for her to engage will be the college students and their age group. In this way, she can also tap the tourist market without really having to do much. Hope this helps! Please put Brainliest! Have a great Day!
it is useful to identify workers within a specialist area because if you need something done quickly and accurately, you can call the person who is really good at something, to help you without worrying if you wont complete the task on time.
Answer:
Contraction cycle or Recession
Explanation:
The cyclical unemployment is due to the cycles of economy ( expantion:Grow and contraction: recession) Under these circumstances unemployment is considered normal as the economy cannot sustain itself always in an expansion cycle.
Answer:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.
Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.
For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
