Civil right is the right not to be treated unfairly for such aspects as gender, race, disability, etc. This also included the right to exercise their own religion.
Civil liberty is any guaranteed freedom or right, such as Freedom of Speech, the right to privacy and the right to marry.
Answer:
The need to have better protection led to innovations in tools and weapons.
Explanation:
It began at a point when the various insignificant city-state rules of the Spring and Autumn period had been incorporated into seven significant contenders and a few insignificant enclaves. It was disturbed by two hundred years of brutality and combat. It profited from the leadership of philosophers who struggled with the king. It encountered strong guidance from feudal chiefs under the king.
Internal and external = physical and emotional
Answer: Procedure
Explanation: The procedure component involves guidelines and steps to follow in other to convert the vast knowledge and information stored in databases into useful insight. The instructions required to analyze and process data are also embedded in the procedural component.
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
