Answer:
The main pro is that this is a worldwide initiative, so the message spreads everywhere - from the Third-World countries, to the developed countries, as no society is immune to mistreating and abusing women and children. The women and children who have been victims can feel that they are not alone and left to themselves. Also, this campaign is meant to contribute to the shift of the paradigm. Politicians and high officials are supposed to use the opportunity to talk about the issues.
However, there are also the cons, as in every campaign. First of all, in many countries, this campaign has turned into a celebration of women's rights, instead of being, first and foremost, an awareness-raising campaign that wants to change things for the better. Second, in some countries (such as South Africa), churches are included in the campaign - the same churches that probably wouldn't accept and help beaten or raped lesbians, for example.
Explanation:
Answer: Psychographic segmentation
Explanation:
What is Psychographic segmentation?
Psychographic segmentation refers to a process where by customers are grouped together based on their shared values, beliefs ,interest, lifestyle, attitude and personality traits.
This makes it easy for the business to target their customers irrespective of where they are situated .
Why Use Psychographic Segmentation?
When your customers have vast needs it can be difficult to know what to market to them that where psychographic segmentation becomes useful it makes it easy to sell your product to people who seems to be so different in the outlook
Answer:
Social Development is basically about improving the well-being of every individual in societies so that they can reach their full potential. The success of society is linked to the well-being of each and every citizen oh, Social Development means investing in people so it requires the removal of barriers so that all citizens can Journey towards their dreams with confidence and dignity and progress as much as possible
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The quote is "if the Treaty of Versailles war fair, the Second World War would not have occurred."
I can justify this statement? in the following way.
The victorious allies in World War I forced Germany to pay for war reparations. Yes, France and Great Britain did not really want a peace treaty. They wanted retribution and forced Germany to pay for all the destruction created during the war.
Germany was especially opposed to Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles because it held Germany (and Austria) responsible for the war and required reparations. Germany also was forced to disarm its military.
In the end, this also resulted in a substantial loss of territory for Germany. All of these decisions and actions created so much pain and resentment in Germany. They helped set the stage for European conflict that would eventually result in World War II.
Answer:
Um? what's your question? If you put a question I can definitely try and help
Explanation:
