<h3><u>
Full question:</u></h3>
Which of the following has the biggest impact on consumer goods during war times?
a. Consumers deferring purchases in hopes of a better deal
b. High interest rates
c. Low inflation
d. High inflation
<u>Answer:</u>
The biggest impact on consumer goods during war times was High inflation
<u>Explanation:</u>
Inflation raised during or as an immediate outcome of these struggles of stock markets endured dull subsequent termination of the war. The government demanded to execute price and wage restrictions in acknowledgment of inflation which had risen due to the extra inducement that was generated by government spending.
Distinctly, both using and financing continued building subsequent the war; nevertheless, the growth was beneath the course rate before the war. Prices, influenced by the rate of inflation, commonly affect consumer spending on goods significantly.
Answer:
$238000
Explanation:
The computation of the carrying value of the bond is shown below:
Given that
Face Value of Bonds = $250,000
Proceeds from issuance of bonds = $235,000
Before that we need to compute the following things
Now
Discount on Bonds Payable = Face Value of Bonds - Proceeds from issuance of bonds
= $250,000 - $235,000
= $15,000
Life of Bonds = 10 years
Now
Discount on Bonds amortized annually = Discount on Bonds Payable ÷ Life of Bonds
= $15,000 ÷ 10
= $1,500
Now
Discount amortized is
= Discount on Bonds amortized annually × expired life
= $1,500 × 2
= $3,000
Finally
Carrying Value of Bonds = Issue Price + Discount amortized
= $235,000 + $3.000
= $238,000
The correct answer is $380 per unit.
The lower-of-cost-or market rule requires that you report the lower value of either the purchase price or current market price of items in inventory. In this case the current market price is lower, so it should be used when calculating the value of inventory.
<span>you are still likely to do the favor for ben because you have just been a victim of the: lowball technique
The lowball is a selling technique in which an item is offered at a lower price than actually intended AFTER we increase the basis price. This technique often works because people have the tendency to conform to additional favor is it convinced to do another favor before
</span>
Answer:
5 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
10 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
Explanation:
Alphaland's opportunity cost of producing one ton of pepper = 80 ÷ 5
= 16 tons of salt
Betaton's opportunity cost of producing one ton of pepper = 3 ÷ 1
= 3 tons of salt
Alphaland's opportunity cost of producing one ton of salt = 5 ÷ 80
= 0.0625 tons of pepper
Betaton's opportunity cost of producing one ton of salt = 1 ÷ 3
= 0.3333 tons of pepper
Therefore, Betaton has a comparative advantage in producing pepper because it has the lower opportunity cost of producing pepper as compared to Alphaland. On the other hand, Alphaland has a comparative advantage in producing salt because it has the lower opportunity cost of producing salt as compared to Betaton.
Hence, Betaton is specialized in the production of pepper and Alphaland is specialized in the production of salt.
Trade is beneficial for both the nations when Alphaland buys pepper at a price lower than the 16 tons of salt and Betaton sells pepper at a price greater than 3 tons of salt.
Trade ratios:
5 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
10 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
