<span>((x+deltaX)^2+x+deltaX-(x^2+x))/deltaX = (x^2 + 2x delta x + (delta x)^2 + x + delta x - x^2 - x) / delta x = delta x (2x + delta x + 1) / delta x = 2x + delta x + 1
Therefore, </span>Lim as x tends to 0 of <span>((x + delta X)^2 + x + deltaX - (x^2 + x)) / deltaX</span> = 1 + delta x
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Quadrant I
Answers. Sample Response: If (−2, −8) is reflected across both axes, it will be located at (2, 8), which is in Quadrant I. When a point is reflected across both axes, the signs of both the x- and y-coordinates change.
It is 350% I think, because you are trying to find how many groups of 2 go into 7. So, you have to divide 7 by 2. You get 3.5. 3.5 in percentage form is 350%
Answer:
($2.123 ; $2.149)
Step-by-step explanation:
The prediction interval is expressed as :
Predicted value ± standard Error
Predicted value = $2.136
Standard Error = $0.013
Prediction interval :
Lower boundary = $2.136 - $0.013 = $2.123
Upper boundary = $2.136 + $0.013 = $2.149
($2.123 ; $2.149)
B.) The prediction interval provides a range for which the predicted value or price should fall Given a certain degree of probability. If the true value falls within this interval, then, our prediction would be deemed to have occurred not by chance.
Since the actual price within the predicted price interval, then I agree with the judge's Decison that the price was not artificially depressed.
