Answer:
Aight, I am so so so sorry if I get this wrong, normally I wouldn't answer a question I'm not 100% confident about, but it seems like nobody else is gonna answer soooo
William Hartsfield was the 49th and 51st mayor of Atlanta, Georgia. He served six terms, longer than any other person in the city's history. He is credited with developing Atlanta into an aviation powerhouse and with building its image as "A City Too Busy to Hate".
The boll weevil, introduced to the state in 1915, greatly reduced state cotton yields. Georgia's cotton acreage declined from 5.2 million acres in 1914 to 2.6 million in 1923. Overproduction in other parts of the country and foreign competition increased the supply of cotton and decreased the price.
The three governors controversy (governor race of 1946) was a political crisis. Three men made claims to the governorship: Ellis Arnall, the outgoing governor, Melvin E. Thompson, the lieutenant governor-elect, and Herman Talmadge, Eugene Talmadge's son.
Though I'm sure you know this one, Pearl Harbor was a surprise aerial attack on the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor on Oahu Island, Hawaii, by the Japanese that precipitated the entry of the United States into World War II.
In conclusion, I'ma take a wild guess and say that the boll weevil and the bombing of pearl harbor seem like the most likely answers.
Really hope this helps!
Answer:
<h3>te llamas como te llamas como te llamas y hay y su. jurídica. td agua Nike</h3>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
The correct answer is
<span>A: freedom to be secure at home
This is the right that establishes that if you're in your home then that is your private area and no government official can enter or bother you inside if they don't have warrants or similar things given by the court. Inside your home you are protected from the state as long as you are not a suspect in a criminal activity.</span>
