Answer:
A). Subjects who were given misleading information after viewing the slides were far less accurate in their memories for the kind of sign present than were subjects who were given no such information.
Explanation:
As per the given example, option A displays the results or consequences of the given study which researched the 'impacts of various types of information on human memory'. The results would reveal that 'subjects who were offered misleading information were less correct in their memories in comparison to the subjects who were not proffered with any such information' as the wrong or misinformation leads to form inaccurate or false memories in their mind which implies that 'memories can not be reliable'. Therefore, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
<span>"according to some research, the degree" of implicit prejudice has declined, but the degree of explicit </span><span>prejudice keeps it alive under the surface.
</span>
Implicit and explicit are two opposite words, the meaning of implicit is, "inferred or saw however not doubtlessly or straightforwardly communicated." whereas explicit means "to completely and unmistakably express something, leaving nothing suggested."
A nondurable good lasts for less than three years when used on a regular basis.
TRUE
The answer is Personal Fable. It is a conviction held by numerous youths revealing to them that they are uncommon and one of a kind, to such an extent that none of life's troubles or issues will influence them paying little respect to their conduct. Hypothetical clarifications joined by two examinations endeavoring to elucidate the part of the Personal Fable are introduced. Explanations behind clashing discoveries are talked about, trailed by a few ramifications for nursing and other human services suppliers of this tricky however instinctively engaging build.
