All categories

3 years ago

Why do historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry?

Social Studies

2 answers:

Sholpan [36]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. They are drawn by people who have an opinion about the event.

Explanation:

Political cartoons are considered a primary source (also an original source), because they were created under the time of the study. Political cartoons are also a testimony of public opinion and express feelings of discontent that existed during a specific historical time; because of this, historians can find in them a valuable source for historical inquiry.

hammer [34]3 years ago

6 0

Historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry because they <span>are drawn by people who have an opinion about the event. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "b". I hope the answer has helped you.</span>

You might be interested in

How did bartolome de las casas help the natives ?????Please help me

HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

He wanted to abolish slavery within the natives after he exposed their treatment by other Europeans.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Five importance of drainage features

allsm [11]

Answer:

◇ DEEP GORGES.

◇PATTERN OF FLOW OF WATER

◇ INTENSE EROSION

◇RIVER COURSES IN THE PLAIN

◇THE NATURE OF MOUNTAINOUS COURES.

3 0

3 years ago

Which crime is a felony? A. public intoxication B. reckless driving C. aggravated assault D. petty theft

Reptile [31]

I believe it is aggravated assault.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How was Columbus mistaken about the land he claims Spain

DaniilM [7]

He landed on a island called <span>Hispaniola which is now Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Columbus mistakenly though it was North America but it was the West Indies </span>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Standardize the argument New Jersey legalized sports betting in 2018 and in November alone, made $3230.7 million. This success i

lora16 [44]

Answer:

The argument seems logical but...

Explanation:

In population there is not much difference between New Jersey (9 million) and Georgia (10 million) but I guess in average income there is, and quite a big one too.

We also have to take into account that a state that legalizes sports betting will attract many people in the beginning (because of the novelty) and, more to the point, that probably a lot of these people making sports bets are not residents of New Jersey.

A more ethical argument would be to prove that legalizing sports bets is indeed an effective way to stop the ilegal sports betting.

3 0

3 years ago