Answer:
0.15 for each message
Step-by-step explanation:
The charge per message can be found by dividing the charge by the number of messages. Using the first line of the table, we get ...
charge per message = (total charge)/(number of messages) = $38.40/256
charge per message = $0.15
Alyssa is charged 0.15 for each text message.
_____
We can check other lines of the table to see if charges are really proportional:
$26.55/177 = $0.15
$31.35/209 = $0.15
Answer:
262440
Step-by-step explanation:
108/100×243000
for the implicit integration I got:
the vertical tangent would at points at which y' goes to infinity.
that happen when the right-hand side has singularities, that is, the denominator is 0:
so the two points y above have a vertical tangent.
Answer:Well, I don't know what you got so I can't tell you if it is right.
If it works in both equations, it depends of whether your equations are set up correctly.
Here is how I would do this problem.
Let x = no. of hot dogs,y = number of sodas.
First equation is just about the number of things.
x + y = 15
Second equation is about the cost of things.
1.5 x + .75 y = 18
solve x+y = 15 for y y = 15-x substitute into second equation
1.5x + .75(15 - x) = 18
You should get the correct answer for number of hot dogs if you solve this correctly. Put your answer in the x + y =15 equation to get y. Then put both x and y into the cost equation and check your answer.
Hope this helps.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Ecological correlation
Step-by-step explanation:
According to a different source, the options that come with this question are:
- Ecological correlation
- Extrapolation
- Lurking variable
- Influential observation
Sarah should be careful about the use of an ecological correlation. An ecological correlation describes two variables that are group means, as opposed to a correlation between two variables that describe individuals. In this case, Sarah did pick 75 random students in each state. However, she then obtained the height and weight means for each state, and proceeded to compare these. Therefore, Sarah is not comparing individual values, but means. It is important to notice this, because correlations at a group level can be much higher than those at the individual level.
