Answer:
The correct answer is: Cognitive dissonance.
Explanation:
The theory of cognitive dissonance was proposed by Leon Festinger and it states that the human beings have an innate tendecy to allign their attitudes and their behaviors.
For instance:
If a person strongly believes that infidelity is morally wrong but engages in it from time to time, the person is experiencing a dissonance.
The dissonance creates psychological tension within the person and the individual either changes the behavior (Stop cheating), or they modify the attitudes they have towards the behavior (There are worse things than being a cheater) for the dissonance to dissapear. In conclusion, they rationalize their behavior.
So the theory that claims that most people act first and then rationalize their behavior is called the cognitive dissonance theory.
The answer is c. An editorial from the charleston mercury in 1860
The answer is "<span>this may be a result of gender-role expectations in Maria's family and not enmeshment."
Enmeshment is a term that depicts an obscuring of limits between individuals, commonly relatives. Enmeshment regularly adds to brokenness in families and may prompt an absence of self-governance and freedom that can become dangerous.
</span>
Answer: free enterprise.
Explanation:
The government can influence how business organizations or companies are going to be run through the implementation of policies(that is, government's regulatory roles) that may make or Mar companies, but a kind of economy in which the Government has limited influence in how market operates such as the price of products is known as FREE ENTERPRISE.
In free Enterprise, the market is determined by the private sector of the economy.
Judge Jones is using legal realism school of jurisprudence.
The philosophical school, historical school, realist school, sociological school, and analytical school are the five schools of jurisprudence.
Legal realism is a theory according to which public policy and prevailing social interests are the sources of all law. In accordance with this view, judges decide cases by taking into account social concerns and public policy in addition to abstract norms.
Legal realism is a kind of jurisprudence that places more emphasis on the law's application in daily life than it does in books. To this purpose, it focused primarily on the acts of judges and the variables that affected judicial decision-making processes.
To learn more about legal realism here
brainly.com/question/14482497
#SPJ4
