Answer: idk ig call for help or like prolly see what it is to like make sure its not dangerous or you should ask someone or like i said call for help
Explanation:
Answer.is a method of clarification and understanding.
Explanation:
this is a method used for a better way of understand a topic.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Evidences that have been analyzed in violation to the right of a defendant can't be used or presented in the court of law, just like the option states ,it has violated the rights and according to the law should not be used in presenting a case to the judge , so option B best explains what the exclusionary rules states.
Answer:
It is not reasonable to say there is a correlation because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be athird variable (lurking variable) that may have a better explanation for the correlation.
Explanation:
Is it not reasonable to say that there's a correlation between the type of car you own and the risk that it will be stolen because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be a third variable that may have a better explanation for the correlation and it might as well means that the third-lurking variable affects the correlation; for example, those cars that are most frequently reported stolen may simply be the cars that are more commonly sold because they are cheaper than the cars that are stolen least often, and thus have a higher chance of being exposed to thieves.
