The reason that made immigration different in the time between the year 1860 and 1920 that in previous years is that the immigrants are likely or tend to be more from the Southern and as well as the Eastern Europe that made it different compared before.
Answer:
Edginuity is sooo hard I’m tryna figure the answer out tooo
Explanation:
Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.
<span>A) Nationalism prevented the countries from uniting </span>
Throughout the Arab region, a strong nationalist sentiment opposed
foreign control. This led to emergence of nationalist organizations as the
National Party in Egypt, the Young Ottomans and then the Young Turks in the
Ottoman Empire. Different nationalist groups had different ideas of the future
of their countries and about how national communities ought to be formed.
Answer:i i looked it up it said geometry so idk hope it helps though
Explanation:
