1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
otez555 [7]
3 years ago
14

Amanda, a business analyst, presents false research findings to her manager to prove that the desired results have been achieved

and to get appreciation for her work. Which level of moral development is illustrated in the given scenario?
Social Studies
2 answers:
Sati [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: preconventional level

Explanation: In the scenario above, The level of moral development shown by the business analyst, Amanda is Preconventional. Preconventional morality is the first of the three stages of morality which also includes Conventional and Postconventional. In preconventional morality, Decision making is based on the kind or type of reinforcement which will succeed an action and not based on whether the action is right or wrong. Amanda presented a false research finding in other to be praised, which is the the reinforcement received for getting the desired result.

iragen [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:Preconventional level

Explanation:Preconventional level

At this stage of moral development , morality doesn't come within a person but it is more driven and can controlled by outside factors such as rules. This is when a person strives to conform to the rules in order to escape punishment or to gain rewards

A person strives to do what is considered socially right and personally satisfying.

Amanda is doing this because she knows it considered right and it will come with a reward for her.

You might be interested in
List 2 natural barriers that have helped keep Russia isolated from the rest of the world.
Goshia [24]

Answer:What Are The Options?

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Bobbi supports her friend Charla, but she thinks that Charla is being underappreciated at her job. She thinks she is being helpf
Whitepunk [10]

Answer: Nagging should not be done

Explanation: Nagging is the activity in which a person starts to find the fault in another person in persistently.This type of behavior in continuous way can lead to irritate or annoy the other person.  

The case mentioned in the question also describes about the nagging behavior showed by Bobbi towards her friend Charla. Bobbi is continuously finding mistake in behavior of Charla that she does not take enough stand for herself in the office. Thus, Charla is getting irritated with this act.

7 0
3 years ago
Dr. Mitchell is a brilliant lecturer who strongly prefers reading to the company of others. Despite being an introvert, however,
Elan Coil [88]

Answer: fundamental attribution error

Explanation: Fundamental attribution error is the tendency of others to explain another persons behaviour based on personality or disposition and give little or no concern for other external factors such as situation surrounding the persons behaviour at that particular point in time.

According to the question, Dr. Mitchell's behaviour during lectures is far different to her behaviour when she is alone or with others. Due to her behaviour during lectures her students labelled her an extrovert when in actual sense she is an introvert. Her out going behaviour during lectures can be associated with her surrounding which is the lecture room and students  while her personality is she like being alone reading.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which decision did the Supreme Court establish the power of judicial review? A. Brown v. Board ofEducation B. Gideon v. Wainw
qaws [65]

Answer:

C. Marbury v. Madison

Explanation:

The case of  Marbury v. Madison determined the power that the judicial branch of the government can have to limit the power of the legislative branch of the government.

Prior to the case, the congress can basically pass any laws that they want without any repercussion.

The case granted the Supreme court with the power of judicial review. This enable the supreme court to examine every laws proposed by Congress before its passed. The supreme court can rejected the proposal and prevented it from becoming actual law if it violated any part of the constitutions.

5 0
3 years ago
Phrases and clauses
n200080 [17]
What?
If you are looking for this you can look it up
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A utilitarian government has to balance the gains from greater income equality against the losses from distorted work incentives
    14·1 answer
  • Study the quote, and then answer the question that follows:
    5·1 answer
  • Why did hans risk frightening liesel terribly?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the color of love? why?
    11·2 answers
  • Why is Queen Jezebels story in the bible? Why is it important?
    9·1 answer
  • Which part of the Asia has desert?Name the deserts.​
    9·2 answers
  • How did residents and local leaders respond to Governor Claiborne’s creation of 12 counties in Louisiana? Check all that apply.
    15·1 answer
  • Any help on these questions please
    8·1 answer
  • The view that all behavior arises from the interaction of heredity and environment is referred to as the _________________ appro
    11·1 answer
  • Genetics play a role in the development of conduct disorder and oppositional defiant disorder, although heritability seems to be
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!