1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scZoUnD [109]
2 years ago
9

Which describes how square S could be transformed to square S prime in two steps? Assume that the center of dilation is the orig

in. On a coordinate plane, square S has points (0, 0), (5, 0), (5, negative 5), (0, negative 5). Square S prime has points (0, 1), (0, 3), (2, 3), (2, 1). a dilation by a scale factor of Two-fifths and then a translation of 3 units up a dilation by a scale factor of Two-fifths and then a reflection across the x-axis a dilation by a scale factor of Five-halves and then a translation of 3 units up a dilation by a scale factor of Five-halves and then a reflection across the x-axis
Mathematics
1 answer:
gayaneshka [121]2 years ago
7 1

Answer:

The correct option is;

A dilation by a scale factor of Two-fifths and then a translation of 3 units up

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the coordinates of the vertices of square S are

(0, 0), (5, 0), (5, -5), (0, -5)

Given that the coordinates of the vertices of square S' are

(0, 1), (0, 3), (2, 3), (2, 1)

We have;

Length of side, s, for square S is s = √((y₂ - y₁)² + (x₂ - x₁)²)

Where;

(x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) are the coordinates of two consecutive vertices

When (x₁, y₁) = (0, 0) and (x₂, y₂) = (5, 0), we have;

s = √((y₂ - y₁)² + (x₂ - x₁)²) = s₁ = √((0 - 0)² + (5 - 0)²) = √(5)² = 5

For square S', where (x₁, y₁) = (0, 1) and (x₂, y₂) = (0, 3)

Length of side, s₂, for square S' is s₂ = √((3 - 1)² + (0 - 0)²) = √(2)² = 2

Therefore;

The transformation of square S to S' involves a dilation of s₂/s₁ = 2/5

The after the dilation (about the origin),  the coordinates of S becomes;

(0, 0) transformed to (remains at) (0, 0) ....center of dilation

(5, 0) transformed to (5×2/5, 0) = (2, 0)

(5, -5) transformed to (2, -2)

(0, -5) transformed to (0, -2)

Comparison of (0, 0), (2, 0), (2, -2), (0, -2) and (0, 1), (0, 3), (2, 3), (2, 1) shows that the orientation is the same;

For (0, 0), (2, 0), (2, -2), (0, -2) we have;

(0, 0), (2, 0) the same y-values, (∴parallel to the x-axis)

(2, -2), (0, -2) the same y-values, (∴parallel to the x-axis)

For (0, 1), (0, 3), (2, 3), (2, 1) we have;

(0, 3), (2, 3) the same y-values, (∴parallel to the x-axis)

(0, 1), (2, 1) the same y-values, (∴parallel to the x-axis)

Therefore, the lowermost point closest to the y-axis in (0, 0), (2, 0), (2, -2), (0, -2) which is (0, -2) is translated to the lowermost point closest to the y-axis in (0, 1), (0, 3), (2, 3), (2, 1) which is (0, 1)

That is (0, -2) is translated to (0, 1) which shows that the translation is T((0 - 0), (1 - (-2)) = T(0, 3) or 3 units up

The correct option is therefore a dilation by a scale factor of Two-fifths and then a translation of 3 units up.

You might be interested in
An item costs n dollars. If the price of the item increases by 25%, the new price can be represented by the expression n + 0.25n
Schach [20]

D.

Explanation

I saw this answer in a different question today.

Moreover, 1n + 0.25n = 1.25n

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help.. I will give points
Daniel [21]

A. 8^9/2= around 11585.2375; (sqrt8)^9= around 11585.2375. So choice A shows a pair of equivalent expressions.

B. (3sqrt125)^9=1,953,125; 125^9/3=1,953,125. So choice B also shows a pair of equivalent expressions.

C. 12^2/7= around 2.03394; (sqrt12)^7= around 5,985.96759. So choice C does not show a pair of equivalent expressions.

D. 4^1/5=around 1.31951; (sqrt4)^5=32. So choice D also doesn't show a pair of equivalent expressions.

Your answers are A and B.

I hope this helps ;)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A researcher at a school of nursing decides to investigate the correlation between a pre- admission HESI examination, high schoo
Nataly_w [17]

Answer: D. Predictive validity

Step-by-step explanation: Predictive validity can be explained as a method of determining the degree or level of correctness of a prediction using pre-existing information or data and values obtained from the actual measurement.

In the scenario above, the researchers investigates the correlation or relationship between the predicted value obtained using a pre- admission HESI examination, high school GPA, and SAT scores and the actual grade received upon completion of the first year. This process is to analyze or determine the validity of our prediction.

4 0
3 years ago
Find the value of x and then the measure of each angle. You should have 3 answers.
Softa [21]

Answer:

x = 7

3x + 11 = 32

8x + 2 = 58

Step-by-step explanation:

3x + 11 + 8x + 2 = 90

11x + 13 = 90

11x = 77

x = 7

3x + 11 = 3(7) + 11 = 32

8x + 2 = 8(7) + 2 = 58

5 0
2 years ago
What does this say? Please Help me!
kvasek [131]

Answer:

That is a child mom with triplets.

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • one way to convert from inches to centimeters is 2 * the number of inches by 2.54. how many centimeters are how many centimeters
    10·1 answer
  • 5 (4z+6)-2(z-4)=2 (2w^2+7w-3)
    8·1 answer
  • 6 - 4x - 2 + x<br><br><br> A. 1<br> B. 4 + x<br> C. 4 - 3x<br> D. 3 - 4x
    10·1 answer
  • I don’t know the ratio to this question
    13·1 answer
  • 0.66×1691 = type a Integer or a decimal estimate the answer by first rounding the first number to the nearest tenth and the seco
    14·1 answer
  • What two consecutive numbers lie between the square root of 37
    8·2 answers
  • SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE
    15·1 answer
  • 3. Graph the function.<br> xy + 25 = 0
    6·1 answer
  • Write the prime factorization of 35.
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!! <br><br> Explain two different ways to solve 72^2/4
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!