1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vlabodo [156]
3 years ago
13

A study investigated whether regular mammograms resulted in fewer deaths from breast cancer over a period of 20 years. Among 30,

615 women who never had​ mammograms, 186 died of breast​ cancer, while only 147 of 30,139 who had undergone screening died of breast cancer. ​a. Do these results suggest that mammograms may be an effective screening tool to reduce breast cancer​ deaths? ​b. If your conclusion is​ incorrect, which type of error did you​ commit?Let p_1 be the proportion of deaths for women who had never had a mammogram and p_2 be the proportion of deaths for women who had undergone screening. Choose the correct null and alternative hypotheses below. a. H0:p1-p2=0 HA:p1-p2>0 b. H0:p1-p2=0 H0:p1-p2≠0c. H0:p1-p2≠0 HA:p1-p2=0d. H0:p1-p2>0 HA:p1-p2<0i. Determine the test statistic. ii. Find the P-value. What is the result of this hypothesis test with a level of significance of 0.1? a. Do not reject the null hypothesis because there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths. b. Do not reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths. c. Reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths. d. Reject the null hypothesis because there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths.
Mathematics
1 answer:
tatyana61 [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Part a

a. H0:p1-p2=0 HA:p1-p2>0

z=\frac{0.00608-0.00488}{\sqrt{0.00548(1-0.00548)(\frac{1}{30615}+\frac{1}{30139})}}=2.003    

p_v =P(Z>2.003)=0.0226  

c. Reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths.

Because we have a significant proportion of women who died without the screening higher than the proportion of women who died using the screening.

Part b

When the null hypothesis is true (that means that our conclusion was incorrect) and we reject it, we commit a type of error I.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation  

X_{1}=186 represent the number of women died who had never had a mammogram

X_{2}=147 represent the number of women died who had undergone screening

n_{1}=30615 sample of who had never had a mammogram

n_{2}=30139 sample of who had undergone screening

p_{1}=\frac{186}{30615}=0.00608 represent the proportion of women died who had never had a mammogram

p_{2}=\frac{147}{30129}=0.00488 represent the proportion of women died who had undergone screening

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the value for the test (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if mammograms may be an effective screening tool to reduce breast cancer​ deaths  , the system of hypothesis would be:  

a. H0:p1-p2=0 HA:p1-p2>0

Null hypothesis:p_{1} \leq p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} > p_{2}  

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}   (1)  

Where \hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{186+147}{30615+30139}=0.00548  

3) Calculate the statistic  

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:  

z=\frac{0.00608-0.00488}{\sqrt{0.00548(1-0.00548)(\frac{1}{30615}+\frac{1}{30139})}}=2.003    

4) Statistical decision

We can calculate the p value for this test.    

Since is a one side right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(Z>2.003)=0.0226  

If we compare  the p value and the significance level given \alpha=0.1 we see that p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

c. Reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths.

Because we have a significant proportion of women who died without the screening higher than the proportion of women who died using the screening.

b. If your conclusion is​ incorrect, which type of error did you​ commit?

When the null hypothesis is true (that means that our conclusion was incorrect) and we reject it, we commit a type of error I.

You might be interested in
What is the halflife
blagie [28]
To model half-life, use the formula A(t)=A_0 (\dfrac{1}{2})^{ \frac{t}{t_{1/2}}. Here, A(t) is the amount remaining after a length of time t. A_0 is the amount that you start with. t_{1/2} is the half-life. You plug in 50 for t_{1/2}, 10 for A_0, and 25 for t. You get A(t)=10( \frac{1}{2})^{25/50} = 10( \frac{1}{2})^{1/2} = 7.07 \ grams.
5 0
2 years ago
A contracting company rents a generator for 6 hours and a heavy duty saw for 6 hours total cost of $48 for another job the compa
Wewaii [24]

Answer:

the hourly rates are $8 and $10 respectively

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that

The generator rents for 6 hours and the total cost is $48

And, for another job The generator rents for 4 hours and the total cost is $40

We need to find out the hourly rates

For the first one

= $48 ÷ 6 hours

= $8

For the second one

= $40 ÷ 4 hours

= $10

Hence, the hourly rates are $8 and $10 respectively

6 0
2 years ago
Look at the two-dimensional net shown. A rectangular pyramid. The rectangular base has a length of 10 meters and height of 3 met
valentina_108 [34]

Answer: Here.

The Solid formed by the net will be a rectangular pyramid.

There are TWO sets of opposite congruent triangular faces.

The base has an area of 30m2

Step-by-step explanation: Don't listen to the B and C dude.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Haeden observed that 65% of her coworkers prefer the local talk news radio station. If 28 of her coworkers do not prefer talk ne
vekshin1

Part A


Let x represent the number of coworkers who prefer the talk news radio.


65% prefer the talk news radio,



100-65=35% will be the percentage that corresponds to coworkers who do not prefer the talk news radio.


Part B


We apply ratio to find x.




65:x



35:28


Hence number that corresponds to 65% will be greater than 28.


If more, less will divide.


This implies that,



x=\frac{65\times 28}{35}=52


Hence 52 of her coworkers prefer the local news talk station.

5 0
3 years ago
Please help!! Will give brainliest
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

b) 16 rt 2

Step-by-step explanation:

using the 45-45-90 triangle trick,

let x=16

then BC is x rt 2, or 16 rt 2

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lance bought 4 tickets to a concert each ticket cost $149 he sells tax rate for the tickets was 7.5% how much did Lance pay for
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    8·1 answer
  • Carl and Beneta are playing a game using the spinner below
    8·1 answer
  • What is the area of a triangle with a base of 2 5/8 mm and a height of 10 mm?
    15·1 answer
  • Use the slope formula to find the slope of the line passing through the given points (-4, 7) and (0, 8)
    13·2 answers
  • Miguel is playing a game in which a box contains four chips with numbers written on them. Two of the chips have the number 1, on
    12·1 answer
  • Can somebody please help 4=-0.8n
    11·2 answers
  • Solve the inequality <br><br> 4x&lt;-12
    11·1 answer
  • Say ok If u need points... if so look for my next guestion its goanna bee woth 100
    5·1 answer
  • Nerissa has 5 pink bows, 1 blue bow, and 4 purple bows in a box. She will randomly choose 1 bow from the box. What is the probab
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!