1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vlabodo [156]
3 years ago
13

A study investigated whether regular mammograms resulted in fewer deaths from breast cancer over a period of 20 years. Among 30,

615 women who never had​ mammograms, 186 died of breast​ cancer, while only 147 of 30,139 who had undergone screening died of breast cancer. ​a. Do these results suggest that mammograms may be an effective screening tool to reduce breast cancer​ deaths? ​b. If your conclusion is​ incorrect, which type of error did you​ commit?Let p_1 be the proportion of deaths for women who had never had a mammogram and p_2 be the proportion of deaths for women who had undergone screening. Choose the correct null and alternative hypotheses below. a. H0:p1-p2=0 HA:p1-p2>0 b. H0:p1-p2=0 H0:p1-p2≠0c. H0:p1-p2≠0 HA:p1-p2=0d. H0:p1-p2>0 HA:p1-p2<0i. Determine the test statistic. ii. Find the P-value. What is the result of this hypothesis test with a level of significance of 0.1? a. Do not reject the null hypothesis because there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths. b. Do not reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths. c. Reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths. d. Reject the null hypothesis because there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths.
Mathematics
1 answer:
tatyana61 [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Part a

a. H0:p1-p2=0 HA:p1-p2>0

z=\frac{0.00608-0.00488}{\sqrt{0.00548(1-0.00548)(\frac{1}{30615}+\frac{1}{30139})}}=2.003    

p_v =P(Z>2.003)=0.0226  

c. Reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths.

Because we have a significant proportion of women who died without the screening higher than the proportion of women who died using the screening.

Part b

When the null hypothesis is true (that means that our conclusion was incorrect) and we reject it, we commit a type of error I.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation  

X_{1}=186 represent the number of women died who had never had a mammogram

X_{2}=147 represent the number of women died who had undergone screening

n_{1}=30615 sample of who had never had a mammogram

n_{2}=30139 sample of who had undergone screening

p_{1}=\frac{186}{30615}=0.00608 represent the proportion of women died who had never had a mammogram

p_{2}=\frac{147}{30129}=0.00488 represent the proportion of women died who had undergone screening

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the value for the test (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if mammograms may be an effective screening tool to reduce breast cancer​ deaths  , the system of hypothesis would be:  

a. H0:p1-p2=0 HA:p1-p2>0

Null hypothesis:p_{1} \leq p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} > p_{2}  

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}   (1)  

Where \hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{186+147}{30615+30139}=0.00548  

3) Calculate the statistic  

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:  

z=\frac{0.00608-0.00488}{\sqrt{0.00548(1-0.00548)(\frac{1}{30615}+\frac{1}{30139})}}=2.003    

4) Statistical decision

We can calculate the p value for this test.    

Since is a one side right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(Z>2.003)=0.0226  

If we compare  the p value and the significance level given \alpha=0.1 we see that p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

c. Reject the null hypothesis because there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that screening reduces the proportion of deaths.

Because we have a significant proportion of women who died without the screening higher than the proportion of women who died using the screening.

b. If your conclusion is​ incorrect, which type of error did you​ commit?

When the null hypothesis is true (that means that our conclusion was incorrect) and we reject it, we commit a type of error I.

You might be interested in
HELP HELP <br> PLZ I WILL MARK YOU BRILL
Nikitich [7]

Answer:

1) 55 2)60-80 3)95 4)92.5(mean), 92.5 (median), 95 (mode) 5) the outlier greatly offsets the data as it is no where near the other data points.

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How is the building code for using asphalt shingles on a roof related to the definition of slope?
iren2701 [21]
Because they're both slant like and they both is like you're going down a hill
8 0
3 years ago
A culture started with 4,000 bacteria. After 5 hours, it grew to 4,800 bacteria. Predict how many bacteria will be present after
eimsori [14]
First we need to find k ( rate of growth)
The formula is
A=p e^kt
A future bacteria 4800
P current bacteria 4000
E constant
K rate of growth?
T time 5 hours
Plug in the formula
4800=4000 e^5k
Solve for k
4800/4000=e^5k
Take the log for both sides
Log (4800/4000)=5k×log (e)
5k=log (4800/4000)÷log (e)
K=(log(4,800÷4,000)÷log(e))÷5
k=0.03646

Now use the formula again to find how bacteria will be present after 15 Hours
A=p e^kt
A ?
P 4000
K 0.03646
E constant
T 15 hours
Plug in the formula
A=4,000×e^(0.03646×15)
A=6,911.55 round your answer to get 6912 bacteria will be present after 15 Hours

Hope it helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the area or perimeter for carpeting a floor?
zheka24 [161]
You have to put numbers for what you want the area or perimeter to be and do accordingly 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
There are 20 20 coins in a jar. Each coin is either a nickel or a quarter. If one of the coins is selected at random, the probab
sveta [45]

Answer: there are 8 quarters in the jar

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the number of nickels that is inside the jar.

The total number of coins inside the jar is 20.

Probability is expressed as

Number of possible or favorable outcomes/total number of outcomes.

The probability of selecting a nickel is 0.6. This is expressed as

0.6 = x/20

Cross multiplying, it becomes

x = 20 × 0.6

x = 12

Since there are 12 nickels inside the jar, then the number of quarters would be

20 - 12 = 8

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • F(x)=x+3 and g(x)=x-5
    9·1 answer
  • find the equation in slope intercept form of a line that is a perpendicular bisector of segment AB with endpoints A(-5,5) and B(
    7·1 answer
  • Geometry! what is the value of c.. please help
    7·1 answer
  • Solve each equation.<br> 10-2log9(1/4x)=9
    15·1 answer
  • Pls help :(
    10·1 answer
  • A theater has 20 rows of seats. If there are 4 seats in the 1st row 12 in the 2nd row, 20 in the 3rd row . How many seats are th
    8·2 answers
  • 69+420 what is the ansewer​
    8·2 answers
  • Find the total surface area of the prism pictured.
    14·1 answer
  • JUST EXPLAIN HOW TO DO THIS IN THE BEST WAY POSSIBLE!
    8·2 answers
  • What are the solutions to 2(x-9)^2=72
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!