Sylvia runs home with dollar signs in her eyes but realizes that she physically can't "tell the heron's secret and give its life away" (2.13). It's never explicitly stated why she does this, but we'd peg her obvious love of nature as Exhibit A and her intense experience atop the oak tree as Exhibit B (for more on this tree experience, check out the "Symbolism, Imagery, Allegory" section—there's more there than meets the eye).
Although Sylvia remains in the forest, she never forgets the hunter, nor is she ever quite sure that she's made the right choice. Although Sylvia is a proto-hippie country gal at heart, she knows that the hunter represented a very different path her life could've taken, and as the story ends, she still wonders where it might have taken her. It doesn't exactly reek of regret, but seems more like a sort of forlorn daydream about what might have been. But hey—we all do that sometimes.
Answer: B
Explanation: a summation is a final statement that a lawyer gives to the judge to encourage the judge that their client is not guilty.
answer d is wrong because jurors don't solely decide whether the client is guilty or not
answer c is wrong because a summation has nothing to do with the "judges instruction"
Answer a is wrong because a summation is a closing statement that the lawyer makes.
No. Disobedience is not a moral responsibility.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
It would be a primary source because it came from the time period. A textbook is a good source, however it would still be considered a secondary source.
