Answer: The president vetoes or refuses to sign a law that he does not agree with.
Explanation:
Checks and balances refers to a system whereby a branch of a government can make amendment or veto the acts of other branch in order to curtail one branch from having too much power.
In this case, the president who is a member of the executive branch can vetoes or refuses to sign a law that he does not agree with. Therefore, the correct option is C.
Answer: D) "Since horses were not introduced to the Americas until Columbus, the Aztecs and Incas did not use horses or advanced weapons, while the Afro-Eurasians had highly developed cavalries and weaponry."
The answer is not A because Afro-Eurasia was composed of giant empires and governments, not small ones. The answer is not B because slavery was acceptable in the Incan and Aztec empires <u>as well as</u> in the Afro-Eurasia. Finally, it can't be C because in Afro-Eurasian governments, <u>only a few</u> were centered on religious beliefs, not all.
They both eat natural and living organisms (herbivore = plant eater) (carnivore = meat eater) and they are both types of eaters/animals. However herbivores and carnivores are more dissimilar than alike.
Answer:
Yes, Canada is a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.
No, peacekeeping is not a myth.
Explanation:
Peacekeepers country often put itself in a position as mediators between other countries that interacted with one another. Canada has done this several times throughout history (one small example would be when Canada mediate a conflict of imports quota between United States and Mexico).
On top of that, Canada also involved in several peacemakers mission when they sent their resources to help the people who are trapped within political conflicts. (one example of this would be when Canada sent help to Cambodia during four peace support missions from 1954 to 2000.)
\
From those historical events alone, I believe Canada could be considered as a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.
Answer:
These lines are from the short story "The Three Trees".
Explanation:
The short story of "The Three Trees" is a moral story about life and how things may turn up, but just not how we want them to. Revolving around the plot of Jesus Christ's life, the three trees were given lives and identities within the story of Christ.
In the beginning of the story, the three trees have their heads full of plans and hopes. The first wanted to be a treasure chest, the second wanted to be a mighty ship while the third just wanted <em>"to grow to be the tallest and straightest tree in the forest"</em>. But none of their plans came true when they were cut down. Later on after many years, they all served their purposes, their hopes came true-
(a) The first tree held the most precious of treasures when Jesus was born and placed in the box made out of the first tree.
(b) The second tree was used as a fishing boat by Jesus and his disciples when Jesus calmed the storm.
(c) And the third became the cross which hold Jesus when he was crucified.
Though they may not become exactly what they had wished for, they still end up doing the thing they most wanted to achieve. Likewise, our plans may not succeed immediately but God has plans for us which will become true, but "<em>just not in the way [we may] have imagined</em>."
