Answer:
b. False
Explanation:
John promised to pay Bill if he painted the garage by Friday but John called him to cancel the deal before he began to do the task and he didn't even buy the supplies. So, John won't be obligated to pay Bill $100 if he buys the supplies and paints John's garage because John let him know that the deal was off before he had bought anything. According to that, the statement is false.
I believe you're looking for the Missouri Compromise.
Answer:
False,
Explanation:
"because, majorly, the European wars of religion were a series of Christian religious wars which were waged in Europe during the 16th, 17th and early 18th centuries. Fought after the Protestant Reformation began in 1517, the wars disrupted the religious and political order in the Catholic countries of Europe."
It was called the Ten-Percent plan
Answer:
C. World War II had depleted the resources of the British Empire, making it economically unstable.
B: Gandhi convinced the British government to free India with his nonviolent peace talks.
Explanation:
WWII gravely sapped the quality of the United Kingdom. This left it without the assets it may have expected to keep up sway over India. It likewise set the United States in place to lead the non-socialist world, which made a difference in light of the fact that the US didn't by and large endorse of imperialism. Along these lines, WWII seriously debilitated Britain's capacity to hold India.
The more essential of these reasons was the long ascent of Indian resistance from being colonized. Starting with the formation of the Indian National Congress in 1885, there was a sorted out development to diminish British power and, in the long run, to convey freedom to India.
The Indian elites were regularly taught in England and benefited not see at all reason that Indians ought not have more power at home. They pushed emphatically for more noteworthy self-government and, in the long run, for independence. The most acclaimed figure in this development was Mahatma Gandhi. His different protests movements against the British undermined the authenticity of British rule and to pick up support for Indian independence.