1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Assoli18 [71]
3 years ago
9

According to Montesquieu, the primary reason for the separation of powers is which of the following? Select one: A. government p

ower is not too heavily concentrated in one branch or individual B. government can operate as efficiently as possible C. to allow certain government officials to specialize in a particular role D. a capricious public cannot frequently change laws
History
1 answer:
polet [3.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Montesquieu (1689-1755) argued laws were a result of historical and political contexts. In being so they were submitted to the human imperfections, making it necessary to actively pursuit some kind of equilibrium or balance when framing them. One way of doing that was creating a separation of powers where they would mutually prevent each other from abuses (A).  

According to Montesquieu, separation of powers between Executive, Legislature, and Judiciary would create a scenario where none of them had enough space to expand in an authoritarian manner. He believed every man with power would want to abuse it, so power should be distributed (in a government) in a system where power could stop power. This idea is heavily present in the US Constitution through checks and balances system.  

You might be interested in
What conclusion can you draw about the effects of civil rights legislation?
-Dominant- [34]
<span>A. Participation of African Americans in government increased led to greater diversity in government.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What two nations were they key participants in the hundred year' war?
Mekhanik [1.2K]

I think the answer is D. England and France.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is brown vs board of eduction of topeka considered a landmark case
lions [1.4K]

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.
7 0
2 years ago
Why did immigrants coming to the U.S settle in the cities ?
Brrunno [24]
Because there was cheaper and faster transportation.
8 0
3 years ago
What effect did the mayflower have on american government.
ddd [48]

Answer:

the Declaration of Independence, which stated that governments derive their powers “from the consent of the governed,” and the Constitution.

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • 1. The vice president has _______ power under the Constitution, but recent vice presidents have had _______ power.
    10·2 answers
  • 4. How the Berlin airlift is a good example of the Cold War.<br> Please I need help !?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help me asap<br> question 4: in first screenshot<br> question 5: in second screenshot
    13·1 answer
  • Instead of simply speaking Navajo, what did the Code Talkers create?
    15·1 answer
  • Which factor most contributed to the cultural
    12·2 answers
  • The Montgomery Bus Boycott proved that ?
    5·2 answers
  • How has the United States dealt with international conflicts during the 20th century?"
    7·2 answers
  • 3.
    15·1 answer
  • The Florida Legislature (3 points)
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE SHELP ASAP (im timed)
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!