Answer:
Option A. Debit unrealized holding gain or loss for $400,000 and credit estimated liability on purchase commitment for $400,000.
Explanation:
According to the Accounting Principles losse are always debited and gains are always credited. This means that the notional loss or gain due to the decrease or increase in the value of the contract must be recorded in the current year by debit or credit respectively.
The notional gain or loss at the end of fiscal year, can be calculated by taking the difference of the Agreed value and the current market value of the contract.
The agreed value of the contract is $2,000,000 and the Market Value is $1,600,000, which means that the unrealized losses are $400,000 ($2,000,000 - $1,600,000).
The double entry would be recording the losses of $400,000 due to technologically decrease in the value:
Dr Unrealized Loss $400000
Cr Estimated liability on Purchase Commitment $400000
Y que no te preocupes por ti y tu que no me lo digas porque yo también me lo he pasado en la cama y te voy hacer un día de clase y me voy con el médico re
Answer: Option A
Explanation: In simple words, intertemporal decision making refers to the study of how the decision made by an individual today affects the choices that he or she have in the future. It is based on the assumption that less consumption today will bring significant increase in consumption tomorrow.
In the given case, despite of having enough income to lead a healthy lifestyle in present,Lee decided to save his money in the future. This will lead to choices fro him that will give him higher utility.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A.
Complete question:
Consider the game of chicken. Two players drive their cars down the center of the road directly at each other. Each player chooses SWERVE or STAY. Staying wins you the admiration of your peers (a big payoff) only if the other player swerves. Swerving loses face if the other player stays. However, clearly, the worst output is for both players to stay! Specifically, consider the following payouts. Player two Stay swervePlayer one stay -6 -6 2 -2 swerve -2 2 1 1
a) Does either player have a dominant strategy?
b) Suppose that Player B has adopted the strategy of Staying 1/5 of the time and swerving 4/5 of the time. Show that Player A is indifferent between swerving
and staying.
c) If both player A and Player B use this probability mix, what is the chance that they crash?
Explanation:
a. There is no dominant strategy for either player. Suppose two players agree to live. Then the best answer for the player is to swerve(-6 versus -2). Yet if the player turns two, the player will remain one (2 vs 1).
b. Player B must be shown to be indifferent among swerving and staying if it implements a policy (stay= 1⁄4, swerving= 5/4).
When we quantify a predicted award on the stay / swerving of Player A, we get
E(stay)= (1/5)(-6)+ (4/5)(2)= 2/5 E(swerve)= (1/5)(-2)
c. They both remain 1/5 of the time. The risk of a crash (rest, stay) is therefore (1/5)(1/5)= 1/25= 4%
Indian currency value . and law and order RBI role
