With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.
Answer:
A. They were much more likely than adults to be injured.
The website is the secondary, good and can be biased source of information.
Are websites reliable sources of knowledge?
Although government websites are reliable, watch out for sites that are trying to trick you by using these suffixes. Websites run by nonprofit organizations may also include trustworthy information, but you should take some time to analyze these factors to see if they might be biased.
Do websites serve as the primary source of information?
If a website synthesizes, analyses, and processes data from primary sources, it qualifies as a secondary source. A secondary source website may contain published blog entries, review articles, bibliographies, reference volumes, indexes, journals, commentaries, and treatises as well as other types of information.
Learn more about the website as a source of information with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11170060
#SPJ4
The philosophers of the Enlightenment hoped to improve human society by <span>using reason to solve human problems. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a". I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your help.</span>
The answer is b because we have three branches and no one of those branches has more power than the other
