Yes, if something has a positive side on something or someone it would be legal.
Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.
Explanation:
In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.
Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.
she ends up bring horrible things upon the world (Old age, war, sickness and death are a few little known things lol) but she also brings hope to the world as well wen she opens the box a second time.
A participle has the form of verb + -ing. So the only such word here is 'smiling' that is the participle in this sentence. It modifies 'woman', that is, it refers to how the woman opened the door - smiling pleasantly.
