All categories

3 years ago

If Jaime wants to find 60% of 320, which table should he use?

Mathematics

2 answers:

Virty [35]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Akimi4 [234]3 years ago

5 0

so 60 of 320 is 18.75 so, that;s what you need to find I don't really get what you put on the side the percents and totals those thing but you need to find is which one equals 18.75. Hope this helped:)

You might be interested in

Anca rolls two number cubes labelled 3 to 8. She adds the numbers that show on the cubes. List the possible outcomes. b) What is

Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

Find the theoretical probability that you will choose each color. P(green) = ___/___ ... 98% or 100%. 3. Bailey uses the results from an experiment to calculate the probability of each color of block being chosen from a bucket. He ... If the sum of the two number cubes in even, Player 1 (or) 2 scores a point.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Mark spends a total of $68.82 for 2 pairs of sneakers with the same cost. The sales tax is $5.32. Mark also uses a coupon for $3

shutvik [7]

Each pair of sneakers cost $33.25

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

Total spent by Mark = $68.82

Sales tax = $5.32

Coupon used = $3.00

Price without sales tax = Total spent - sales tax

Price without sales tax = 68.82 - 5.32 = $63.50

As Mark used coupon, we will add this amount.

Amount of sneakers = Price without sales tax + Coupon used

Amount of sneakers = 63.50+3.00 = $66.50

As this is price of two sneakers, we will divide it by 2;

Cost of one sneaker = $\frac{66.50}{2}=\$33.25$

Each pair of sneakers cost $33.25

Keywords: subtraction, addition

Learn more about addition at:

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0

3 years ago

Of those women who are diagnosed to have early-stage breast cancer, one-third eventually die of the disease. Suppose a screening

Finger [1]

Answer:

A) Alternative hypothesis; Ha: p_o > ⅔

B) Null hypothesis;

H0: p_o = ⅔

C) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the community screening programme was effective

D) p-value = 0

Its less than the significance value and so we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the community screening programme was effective

Step-by-step explanation:

A) We are told that ⅓ of those diagnosed eventually die of the disease. Thus, ⅔ is the fraction that will survive the disease.

Thus, the null hypothesis is;

H0: p_o = ⅔

We are told that a screening programme was started to increase the survival rate. Thus,the alternative hypothesis is;

Ha: p_o > ⅔

B) null hypothesis is;

H0: p_o = ⅔

C) 164 out of the 200 women selected survived the disease.

Thus sample proportion is;

p^ = 164/200

p^ = 0.82

For the z-score value, we will use the formula;

z = (p^ - p_o)/√((p_o(1 - p_o)/n)

Now, p_o = ⅔ = 0.67

Thus;

z = (0.82 - 0.67)/√((0.67(1 - 0.67)/200)

z = 4.51

From online p-value from z-score calculator, we have p-value ≈ 0

This is less than the significant level of 0.05 and therefore we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the community screening program was effective.

D) p-value ≈ 0

Reject the null hypothesis

4 0

2 years ago

–42t + 80t + –59t − –97 = –29

Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

Hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

t=6

5 0

2 years ago