They report to The Cabinet’s role
The crime of False Pretenses is also known as Theft by False Pretenses or Larceny by False Pretenses. The crime of False Pretenses requires: a false representation. of a material fact (past or present) with the intent to defraud.
A crime at common law. The illegal taking of the property of another with intent to deprive the owner thereof.
The main difference between false pretenses and larceny is that a thief who secures title is guilty of false pretenses while someone who secures possession through fraud is guilty of larceny by trick.
Hope it helps you:)
In politics, lobbying, persuasion, or interest representation refers to the practice of legally attempting to influence the decisions, actions, or policies of public servants, most frequently politicians or regulators.
communicating with team members and clients the communications and replies of the government and other stakeholders. studying and researching proposed laws and regulations. attending meetings and activities, such as hearings before Congress. educating corporate officers and government authorities. They need to find a way to influence lawmakers to cast their votes in favor of the interests they represent. This entails creating customized appeals for both particular voters and voting blocs, such as Southerners or pro-choice voters. On occasion, lobbyists will also lobby one another. In its original sense, lobbying related to efforts to influence legislators' votes, typically in the lobby outside the legislative chamber.
Lobbying is any endeavor by people or private interest organizations to influence government decisions. There will always be lobbying of some kind.
Learn more about lobbying here: brainly.com/question/29614996
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Case of the Supreme Court Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee nation in Georgia because it was decided that Georgia laws did not apply to Cherokee territory.
Explanation:
In the Worcester case v. Georgia, the Supreme Court denied Georgia jurisdiction and state authority over the Cherokee community. In other words, this meant that Georgia law and authority did not apply to Cherokee territory. Although this decision was a small victory for the Cherokee people, the decision was not very helpful as the state of Georgia totally ignored the Supreme Court decision and forced the Cherokee community to march west.