1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudik [331]
2 years ago
6

The concepts of Expectation, Reliance and Nominal damages are incompatible with Sections 73 and 74 of Contract Act. Furthermore,

the concept of remoteness and punitive damages is alien to Pakistani Contract Law” What is your opinion and Why?​
Law
1 answer:
lapo4ka [179]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

This article is written by Khushi Agrawal, a student of Symbiosis Law School, Noida. In this article, she has discussed the concepts of types of damages under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 in detail.

Introduction

Section 73 provides compensation for loss or damage caused by the breach of contract. When a contract has been broken, the party that suffers from such infringement is entitled to receive compensation for any loss or damage resulting from such infringement. Such compensation shall not be given for any remote and indirect loss or damage sustained as a result of the breach.

You might be interested in
Stephen has been sentenced to five years in prison after being found guilty of burglary. However, he has demonstrated extremely
inessss [21]

Answer:

The answer according to the severity of crime would most likely be probation.

Explanation:

The judge will grant probation and the inmate has to comply with the terms.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do i send messages??? and read???
LekaFEV [45]
I have no idea but I think it all relies on how many points you have
4 0
3 years ago
For which type of vehicle is insurance not required?
frozen [14]

Answer:

a motorcycle or a dirtbike

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Martina is arrested for a crime and refuses to take the witness stand at his or her trial.
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.

Hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
What is environmental studies??
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

another fake id of someone who put same pfp as u.

and name also

or it can be ur id.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which laws was passed to regulate unfair competitive practices and practices that deceive or are unfair to consumers?
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the most important speech given at the national convention?​
    5·1 answer
  • Which type of corrections are alternatives that fall between probation and a prison sentence?
    8·1 answer
  • Challenge #9 To decide about heredity You are destined to be a criminal I know You will break the law You are just like your bro
    8·1 answer
  • Help please I am giving 10 points
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a basis for personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant in a child support case
    10·1 answer
  • The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Ye
    7·1 answer
  • Please help,I’ll mark you as the brainliest!!!A certain state uses the following progressive
    8·1 answer
  • List two pathways from the Business Management and Administration Career Cluster. ​
    12·1 answer
  • Hahahahaha
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!