Answer:
“Should” or “should not” depend on the cost rate of the option and the risk appetite of investors.
Explanation:
An option is a contract that allows investors to buy or sell instruments such as security, Exchanged Traded Fund or an index at a pre-determined price over a certain period of time.
If the option will cost the investor an additional $10,000 and it is the cost for an option of $10 million investment, then it cost only 0.1% additionally, but it can secure the position of this investment; then the investor should buy this option.
Vice versa, if the additional $10,000 is much more than expected profit, and even lower but significantly drop down the total profit of an investment; and the investor always wish to have a high profit regardless high risk; then he shouldn’t buy this option.
Answer:
b. complement goods
Explanation:
Complement goods -
These are the type of goods , that are related to each other in a certain manner , is referred to as complement goods.
These type of good are also referred to as paired goods or associated goods .
In case of complement goods , if a person buys first good , then he might require the second good too.
These goods can even alters the prices of each other .
For example ,
people buying a CD player , need to buy the corresponding CD too , and hence ,
CD player and CD are complement goods.
Hence , from the given scenario of the question,
The correct option is b. complement goods .
A complementary good is a good whose use is related to the use of an associated or paired good. Two goods (A and B) are complementary if using more of good A requires the use of more of good B.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
The below shows the calculation of variance
Budgeted direct labor (per unit) 0.60
Units 2,000
Budgeted direct total labor (hrs) 1,200
Actual hours 1,160
Standard rate $17
Direct labor efficiency variance
The direct labor efficiency variance
= (Budgeted hours - Actual hours) × Standard rate
= (1,200 - 1,160) × $18
= $720 favourable
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The following would be the specifications of the training module for the cashiers:
1. There would be multiple modules consisting of the job responsibilities as refresher courses and at the same time, the new market conditions and additional job related things that they must be doing in the near future would be the other modules.
2. The key areas that the multi module training program would be focussing on would be, customer relationship training, system and data maintenance training, documentation and accounting module
3. The training intervention would be preferably on job and alongside there would be a mentor/coach allotted to the cashiers who are experts in the field preferably store managers and functional experts. For the system related modules, they would be having simulation based modules. Only during the non rush-hours there would be offline training and update sessions with respect to the progress made on their training and the productivity improvement they have achieved over the past week.
The incentives associated with the productivity improvement would be translated into incentivising the cashiers to take up the training modules. The weekly update on the productivity improvement and the progress in their training would inturn make them competitive in nature. While coming to why such distribution has been done with respect to the modules, essentially if we look at the job of the cashiers, it’s a round the clock job and they would lose out on precious working hours if the training is done on an offline basis.
The simulations would definitely help understand the process but the on job training would be the one that is standing out, as they would be continuing their task and at the same time, the result is right in front on them to experience and therefore the distribution of the modules to not stress them out and at the same time not losing out on their time as well.
<span>The term applied to the periodic expiration of a plant asset's cost over its life in a balanced and orderly way is depreciation. It is not process for valuation nor is process that results in gathering of cash. Land expenses are not subject to depreciation.</span>
