Answer:
1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
1/2 James' fraction of Michael
2/3 Trina's fraction of James
1/2 x 2/3 = 1/3
Answer:
You can opt to study the entire population when the population is well defined(Complete sampling frame) and small.
It can eliminate any potential bias occurring through sampling technique, but other than that it is really not justified to consume more resources and time.
Answer:
one solution.
Step-by-step explanation:
using elimination, u can get one solution
21−=2(2−)=2cos(−1)+2 sin(−1)
−1+2=−1(2)=−1(cos2+sin2)=cos2+ sin2
Is the above the correct way to write 21− and −1+2 in the form +? I wasn't sure if I could change Euler's formula to =cos()+sin(), where is a constant.
complex-numbers
Share
Cite
Follow
edited Mar 6 '17 at 4:38
Richard Ambler
1,52199 silver badges1616 bronze badges
asked Mar 6 '17 at 3:34
14wml
23122 silver badges99 bronze badges
Add a comment
1 Answer
1
No. It is not true that =cos()+sin(). Notice that
1=1≠cos()+sin(),
for example consider this at =0.
As a hint for figuring this out, notice that
+=ln(+)
then recall your rules for logarithms to get this to the form (+)ln().
Answer:
y=5/4x+2 is a line perpendicular to y=4/5x+2
