Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
I think the answer is C or A
For the first 6 trips she walked 3.2 kilometers and for the next 6 she made another 3.2 which would be 6.4 kilometers for 12 trips now she made 3 more trips which is half of the amount she originally did so it would be half of the distance also so 3.2 divided by 2 is 1.6 kilometers so for the last 3 trips she walked 1.6 kilometers. now add up all the distance she walked so 6.4 kilometers for the 12 trips plus the 1.6 for the other 3 trips is 8 kilometers in total. she walked 8 kilometers after 15 trips.
Yes it is true that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars because null hypothesis is rejected.
Given among 2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticut trucks, 45 had only rear license plates.
let
be the probability that commercial cars have rear license plates and
be the probability that connected trucks have rear license plates.
Cars Trucks Total
Total 2049 334 2383
x 239 45 284
p 0.1166 0.1347 0.1191
α=0.05
Hypothesis will be :


It is a left tailed test at 0.05 significance.
Standard errors of p=
=
=
=0.0066
Test statistic Z=p difference/standard error
=(0.1166-0.1347)/0.0066
=-0.0181/0.0061
=-2.967
p value=0.001505<5%
Since p is less than 5% we reject null hypothesis.
We cannot calculate standard deviation so we cannot calculate confidence interval.
Hence there is statistical evidence at 5% significance level to support that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars.
Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510
#SPJ4