The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer:
In Greek mythology, Atlas (/ˈætləs/; Greek: Ἄτλας, Átlas) was a Titan condemned to hold up the celestial heavens for eternity after the Titanomachy. Atlas also plays a role in the myths of two of the greatest Greek heroes: Heracles (Hercules in Roman mythology) and Perseus. According to the ancient Greek poet Hesiod, Atlas stood at the ends of the earth in extreme west.[1] Later, he became commonly identified with the Atlas Mountains in northwest Africa and was said to be the first King of Mauretania.[2] Atlas was said to have been skilled in philosophy, mathematics, and astronomy. In antiquity, he was credited with inventing the first celestial sphere. In some texts, he is even credited with the invention of astronomy itself.[3]
Explanation:
None
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Justice is the act to give people what it is appropriate, according to their necessities, work, perseverance, and commitment. Justice must maintain a fair opportunity for people getting what they want and deserve, always under legal circumstances.
The role Justice plays in determining what ought to be done about global poverty is that it has to promote a fair playing field for countries to trade under even circumstances, never granting advantages to the rich countries over the poor ones. Justice will allow fair trade and work opportunities when competing in open markets, so poor countries could have a real chance of benefiting from commerce and foreign investment.
Rich countries should not exploit poor countries, and they have to allow the proper scenario so people can have their basic needs covered.
it is true fungi composed dead organisms
Answer:
The American-Indian Wars were a centuries-long series of battles, ... the Native Americans (or Indians) who had thrived on the land for thousands of years. ... The fierce fighting started over territory and fur trade dominance ... Although they had already begun peace negotiations with the U.S. government.
