Answer: redesign its products to eliminate those features that might have market appeal, but would excessively increase production costs.
Explanation:
The main aim of every organization are typically cost minimization and profit maximization. If I wanted to advise a company on the kind of actions to take to perform value chain activities more cost effectively, I'll tell them to improve their supply chain efficiency as well as use economies of scale and effective utilization of its resources.
Therefore, redesigning its products to eliminate those features that might have market appeal, but would excessively increase production costs is wrong as this will only lead to increase in cost.
Answer:
c. demanding managerial requirements and limited competitive advantage potential that cross-business strategic fit provides.
Explanation:
An unrelated diversification can be defined as a situation in which an existing business or company enters or invest in an entirely new business or industry that do not have any similarity whatsoever with its original business or product line. For example, an automobile manufacturing company that decides to acquire or invest in a clothing or shoe business.
Hence, the two biggest drawbacks or disadvantages of unrelated diversification are demanding managerial requirements and limited competitive advantage potential that cross-business strategic fit provides.
Also, the difficulties in successfully managing a collection of unrelated different business and having minimal competitive advantage potential over its rivals in the industry that cross-business strategic fit provides is another disadvantage of unrelated diversification
Answer:
offering a wide range of products
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
I will go through each and every option explaining the reasons and what option would be the best:
The (a) part says 'difference in wages will eventually disappear since a haircut is a homogeneous good' - This is not true because even though it is an homogeneous product, some customers do have a strong preference for barbers who are not going bald. Therefore, they know their worth and they would want to capitalize on that and get paid just a bit more than bald barbers.
The (b) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will be able to charge a higher price for a haircut to those consumers who have a strong preference for barbers with hair'. - If the barbershop charges higher price for barbers that have hair then the customers will prefer bald barbers as the questions mentions that there is high competition and since it is an homogeneous, customers would be willing to save money and get their haircut from some other barber.
The (c) part says 'barbershops that hire bald barbers will always be much more profitable' - Not necessarily. The reason is that some customers have a strong preference for barbers who are not bald and therefore, that would help barbershops who have barbers with hair to be a bit more profitable as some additional customers would want their services.
The (d) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will always be much more profitable' - This is the best option and the reason for it is because some customers have a strong preference for barbers with hair and that would help the barbershop to earn more. They would have the customers who already indifferent to whoever cuts their hair and in addition to that, they would also have the customers who have their preference.
Hence the answer is D.
Answer: Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct option: limited-life intangible assets.
Patents are considered as a intangible assets. Patents are the intellectual property that a owner can use to exclude others from making, selling and coping technology but for a limited number of years.
In most of the nations patent rights fall under the civil law and if a person wants to take benefit of their patent right then he have to sue someone for infringing the patent to enforce his right.
