Once upon a time there was a little boy named Charles that lived in Alaska. This boy had lots of friends there and he thought that Alaska was the best place in the world.
One day, Charles and his family had to move, since his parents couldn't find a place to work. They moved to a horrible, but cheap house in North Dakota. Charles wanted to cry. He missed all of his friends, and he didn't like North Dakota.
One day, Charles had an idea to go back to Alaska. He decided that he was going to rob a bank that night so he could recuperate the money to return to Alaska.
That night, Charles was starting his plan. When he got to the gates of the bank, he was prepared to shoot everywhere and kill many people. But after the first shoot to nowhere, three security guards caught him, and when Charles wanted to shoot them too, he realized that he didn't have any bullets left. So, the security guards shot Charles 1,000 times and he died horribly.
Never be too greedy. If you are you may have to pay back for it.
While involved in an argument, researchers must devote their focus to the logic and fairness of the paragraph.
<h3>What is an argument?</h3>
The reason(s) which are aimed towards acceptance of individual's beliefs based upon ideologies, theories and activities are all the contents of a healthy argument.
Researchers are advised to lay great focus on the viewpoints related to the logic and fairness given by others to support their individual reasons in such an argument.
Hence, option A holds true of an argument.
Learn more about argument here:
brainly.com/question/9860191
#SPJ1
I believe the answer is: B. To show that Grendel cannot rely on nature for protection
In the story, Grendel perceive that he is blessed by protection from the nature which would always help him in all of his troubles. But when he somehow got his foot stucked in a tree in front of a bull and when he cried and scream for help from the nature, he did not receive any answer.