Well they both helped to modernize/industrialize the U.S, so it depends which view point you would like to take. They stole the plans from england, who had successfully monopolized industrialization for almost a century, who would be upset at this loss of control and therefore business. However an American would probably be thankful for the industry that blossomed as a result of these actions.
During the cold war the US and Russia both had nuclear weapons because If one side decided to attack the other it was ensured that the other would see equal or even more destruction. Basically the mutually assured destruction or MAD deterred people from attacking because they knew they would be destroyed aswell in turn. Preventing military conflict by the mutual understanding that if you provoke or attack us it wont be to far away from us attacking you back
Answer:
Exploit them fully to achieve maximum profit for the parent country.
You didn't provide a list of choices, but I'll provide a key example: The US intervention in Korea. In Korea, when communist forces from the North invaded the South in 1950, the United States intervened (with United Nations backing), battled to keep South Korea free and democratic, and were able to do so. The Soviet Union did not play an active, open role in that war, but did covertly supply <span>material services to the North Korean side, as well as Soviet pilots and aircraft. Keeping communism from spreading in Korea was a way the US was practicing its policy of containment over against Soviet communist influence.</span>
whats described in the box??
