For this problem, the most accurate is to use combinations
Because the order in which it was selected in the components does not matter to us, we use combinations
Then the combinations are
n represents the amount of things you can choose and choose r from them
You need the probability that the 3 selected components at least one are defective.
That is the same as:
(1 - probability that no component of the selection is defective).
The probability that none of the 3 selected components are defective is:
Where is the number of ways to select 3 non-defective components from 117 non-defective components and is the number of ways to select 3 components from 120.
So:
Finally, the probability that at least one of the selected components is defective is:
P = 7.4%
Answer: F=40 or other words n=40
Step-by-step explanation:
F= n/4 + 37
F= 12/4 + 37
F= 3 +37
F =40
Hope this helped! ;)
Answer:
A. Valid
Step-by-step explanation:
The P-value is the probability of getting this result or sample statistic if the null hypothesis is true. That is why a low P-value (smaller than the significance level) is considered evidence to reject the null hypothesis, because the result has little probability of being due to chance.
The statement that the P-value is "the probability of getting results as extreme as or more extreme than the ones in this study if the drug is actually not effective" is valid, as the null hypothesis states generally the opposite of the objective of the study (demonstrate that the drug is effective), and the very low value of the P-value is indicative that this result, if the drug was not effective, has a very low probability.
We have to calculate the amount of money Peter will have in his account after 5 years. Formula for the amount after t years with interest compounded continuously : A = P * e ^(rt)
We know that r = 0.06, t=5, e = 2.71 and p= $8,000
A = 8,000 * 2,718 ^(0.06 * 5) = 8,000 * 2,718 ^ (0.3) = 8,000 * 1.3488158 = 10,798.53 so the answer is 10,798.53