The answer for this qeustion is: Thinking in time
By using scenarios, we can formulate several outcomes that could possibly happen if we decided to follow a certain plan.
If we do this, we could prepare our actions on how to deal with those outcomes before it actually happens in real life.
Answer:
France should specialize in producing phones and import computers from Sweden
Explanation:
France can produce: 4 phones or 3 computers
The opportunity cost of producing 1 phone = (3 ÷ 4)
= 0.75 computers
The opportunity cost of producing 1 computer = (4 ÷ 3)
= 1.33 phones
Sweden can produce: 1 phone or 2 computers
The opportunity cost of producing 1 phone = (2 ÷ 1)
= 2 computers
The opportunity cost of producing 1 computer = (1 ÷ 2)
= 0.5 phones
According to the comparative advantage,
Sweden has a comparative advantage in producing computers because the opportunity cost of producing computers is lower for Sweden than for France.
France has a comparative advantage in producing phones because the opportunity cost of producing phones is lower for France than for Sweden and import computers from Sweden because Sweden has a comparative advantage in producing computers.
This answer would be reliability.
Answer:
In which of the following situations would each of the members be responsible for producing an equal share of the total amount of output sold by the cartel engaged in joint profit maximization?
When marginal costs of production are the same for each of the members of the cartel.
Explanation:
D
The answer to your question is B.
