Answer:
20
Step-by-step explanation:
19+76+12+53+23=183$
she had 325
325-183= 140
therefor 140$- 120$ would leave Tasha with 20
Answer:
(-3,3)
Step-by-step explanation:
use the midpoint formula
Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
It depends on what null hypothesis is under consideration.
One of the most common null hypothesis that are subject of study in a given statistical model is <em>the mean</em> predicted by the model.
In this case, the scientist probably observed that the mean of tusk lengths she obtained in a sample did not match the one predicted with the H-W equation.
So, she decided to perform a statistical study by collecting random samples and measuring the tusk lengths to determine a new possible mean and contrast it against the one predicted by the H-W equation.
<em>Let's call M the mean predicted by the H-W equation, and S the mean obtained by the scientist.
</em>
If M different of S and the p-value is 0.021, that means that <em>there is at most 2.1% of probability that the difference between M and S could be due to a random sampling error.
</em>
It should be kept in mind that the p-value does not represent the probability that the scientist is wrong.
$85.20/6= $14.20/pair is the answer because unit price equals cost/pairs
