Copper
Iron
Nickel
It’s out of thoose 3
Concurring opinion.
A concurring opinion is an opinion written by a Supreme Court justice who agrees with the decision and who the case went to, but may want to add to or comment on part of the decision. On the other hand, a dissenting opinion is by a judge who did not agree with the court decision, and writes down why he/she disagreed.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
False
Explanation:
According to the information given by the US census bureau, the population of the country will be distributed by the year 2042 as a majority constituted by non-Hispanic white individuals. It is important to take into consideration that this information is mainly based in statistics and presuppositions according to the behavior of the growing population in the last years, nevertheless, it would be impossible to give an exact prediction of the data regarding the distribution of racial and ethnic diversity of the country in the coming future.
Answer: The Demographic Yearbook.
Explanation: Demographic Yearbook contains the collection of the official statistics about a variety of topics having a large range. They usually contain the knowledge about the status of the birth, death, population ,etc on yearly basis. They also represent the issues that arise according to the statistic such as education activity,economic rate,mortality rates, etc.This statistics has been collected from the United Nations .
Answer:
U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully proved "lack of equality" in favor of a black applicant to the University of Texas Law School, beginning the process of ending the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. The case was also influential in the landmark case of Brown vs. Board of Education four years later
Explanation:
Sweatt vs. Painter (1950) was a U.S Supreme court case that successfully challenge the separate but equal doctrine of racial segregation which was establish during the ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896.In it ruling against Plessy v. Ferguson case a new verdict was made that the separate school established for blacks lacked substantive equality for a number of reason including the fact that the school had fewer faculty members and inferior law library and other facilities .The Court ruled Sweatt should be admitted to the Texas Law School because the law school for black students was not equal to the law school for white students.
