The correct answer among the choices given is option B. The purpose of an expectorant is to liquefy mucous. An expectorant is a drug that aids in the clearance of mucus in the respiratory system. It thins out mucus so it can be expelled from the body easier.
Answer:
C. by making sure they get equal pay for equal work
Explanation:
The women's fund Semillas had one aim in mind when they began, which was to empower women in the grassroot level so that they would have better lives in rural Mexico.
They had the primary objective of promoting women's rights and gender equality.
Therefore, the women's fund Semillas aim to empower women was by making sure they get equal pay for equal work
Answer: Compensate for the risk
Explanation:
The compensate risk is one of the type of risk control that helps in illustrating the given example of squad as they wants to cross the bridge so the leader of the squad are concern about the various types of associate risk and the hazards regarding the problem.
The compensate risk is one of the concept that helps in typically adjusting with the given situation and risk and managing the given situation effectively. As, the platoon commander directing all the instruction to the squad so they effectively manage given problem.
Therefore, Compensate for the risk is the correct answer.
Barbour and Wright maintain that when the Supreme Court issues a ruling on the constitutionality of a particular bureaucratic regulation, they are "piecemeal".
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is a piecemeal approach accompanied by unsystematic, partial actions taken over periods. A piecemeal judgment is a document provided by an external auditor expressing a view confined to particular line elements within the financial statements of a corporation. In a situation where complete information is not accessible, an auditor can offer a piecemeal opinion.
For an instance, the defendants pursued a piecemeal investigation strategy in the patent infringement case, examining only the records of selected corporate employees. The district court stated that the method was contradictory to the Federal regulations of Civil Procedure and repeated court orders.