No the government should make our decisions because people could the run around freely doing what they like that could be against the law
Answer:
B. The citizens directly vote on a leader.
Explanation:
A presidential democracy is where the executive branch exists separately from the legislature. The citizens in a presidential democracy or the majority have the say to help determine who will be the next president or head of office.
An example that I would give of a situation in which a real-life problem has to be solved or a decision has to be made using good judgement would be the case of deciding what to study in university:
<em>"When I had to decide what I was going to study, I immediately put journalism out of my mind, as I believed it did not suit my personality. Even though I loved writing, I had always imagined that journalists had to be aggressive, </em><em>overconfident</em><em> and pushy, and that news only happened in other, more interesting places. I could not see how that could fit me. The school counselor I talked to kept telling me that this was not the case, but my </em><em>belief perseverance</em><em> would not let me listen to other information. In the end I decided to go for accounting. I believed that accounting was only about boring numbers, and for the first few months, I was responsible of </em><em>confirmation bias</em><em>, as that was the only thing I noticed about my studies. However, over time, I grew to like the path I had chosen, and I do not regret it."</em>
It is true that a promise by one party to pay another for
refraining from an act is enforceable. The deed is being true to one’s own word
and it is also considered as a business and personal law. If there’s a contract
involved, the more it is enforceable.
You're answer would be metacognition.
Meaning awareness and understanding of your own thoughts processes. Like planing how to approach a learning task or self monitoring and correction.
