1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2
Answer:
the answer is true mark brainlest
I think it is b traction control
Answer:
Pearson v. Callahan
Explanation:
This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Hope this Helps!
Answer:
This statement is incorrect, since the theory has enormous relevance in law.
Explanation:
The law is basically a set of norms that regulates life in society, establishing guidelines for coexistence and rules of conduct that, if not complied with, have consequences that can range from simple fines to time in prison.
But unlike what the statement says, the law is composed of a theoretical component, which implies the sociological and cultural study of the law and the society to which it will apply, the consequences that it may have and its use in other societies. Without this study, the laws would be empty of content, since they would be simple rules without any basis and, therefore, very easy to be broken.
