1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klasskru [66]
3 years ago
8

How was the reign of Marcus Aurelius different from that of most emperors?

History
2 answers:
slavikrds [6]3 years ago
7 0
Marcus Aurelius was kinder and more helpful than other emperors who were harsh and cruel.<span />
Pepsi [2]3 years ago
6 0

He was very philosophical and wrote a series of books called "Meditations".

Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor as well as Stoic philosopher. Marcus Aurellius was the last of the leaders commonly known as the Five Good Emperors, and the last emperor of the Pax Romana. Furthermore, he served as consul in 140, 145, and 161.

He turnt into emperor after Antoninus' death. His reign was marked by military conflict.

You might be interested in
What three men wrote the Federalist papers
Readme [11.4K]
James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton were the authors of the Federalist Papers which were a string of 85 essays that supported the US Constitution. 
8 0
4 years ago
3what influence have slavic cultures had in eastern Europe?
7nadin3 [17]

Answer:Slavs are subdivided into East Slavs, West Slavs, and South Slavs. ... of peoples in Europe, residing chiefly in eastern and southeastern Europe but extending

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Need help pls will upvote
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

option 3

Explanation:

The Roman republic was not governed by a pope. It was not a democracy but a republic and it did not have balanced checks on power. It had unchecked tyrants for many years.

7 0
2 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
What was the first mass produced goods of the Industrial Revolution?<br> 5 points
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

Goods that had once been painstakingly crafted by hand started to be produced in mass quantities by machines in factories, thanks to the introduction of new machines and techniques in textiles, iron making and other industries.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1803, the United States purchased an area on this map from France. This purchase motivated the United States to organize
    6·1 answer
  • Programs originally called women's bureaus were the first examples of
    10·1 answer
  • Types of men came to Jamestown in 1607 '
    7·1 answer
  • *PLEASE ANSWER, WILL MARK BRAINLIEST* Before World War I, socialists were a growing segment of the population of Europe. Why did
    7·2 answers
  • Who discovered the South Pass to the Oregon Territory?
    10·2 answers
  • Laws passed by Congress or a state legislature
    11·1 answer
  • In your own words, what is the Social Contract Theory?
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you think so many people within
    5·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to answer these questions about the Jim Crow laws.
    5·2 answers
  • Can someone please help?????<br>^_^ ​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!