The answer would be False.
It's true that Feudalism spread throughout the continent, but it was strongest in England
Under the english feudal system, the king basically own everything in that country, Their feudalism is so strong, they still got their queen and prince in today's society
The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Hence, the correct statement is option C.
<h3>What happened in the case of Wainwright and Arizona?</h3>
In this case, the Supreme Court declared that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have state-appointed attorneys on their behalf.
The missing information is given below:
A. Baker v. Carr (1962) and Engel v. Vitale (1962)
B. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Roe v. Wade (1973)
C. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
D. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)
Hence, The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). the correct statement is option C.
learn more about case of Wainwright and Arizona:
brainly.com/question/10320938
#SPJ1
Actually, I would say there is barely any relations: some of the higher income areas are very democrat ( so the first one is a possible answer), but some other are republican. Some of the richest are republican too. So in the end, i'd say there is no apparent relationship, although if there is, then democrats tend to be richer( but just a bit- the problem is that most of Florida is republican, so it's hard to to tell.
The first blank would be the Bill of rights which set up a bunch of Rights for the american people.
The Second Blank was the <span>Naturalization Act which raised the bar on how many years an immigrant had to wait until it could be eligible for citizenship</span>
In general yes, but that can not always be the case.
Explanation:
The countries around the world have borders of numerous types. While some have been roughly determined on ethnic base or on national identity, some are not. Unfortunately, very often different groups of people from different ethnic or religious groups have tensions between them when put in the same borders, leading to violence, conflicts, and even genocides.
The primary argument as to why the countries should have borders set in accordance to the ethnicity is that it will contribute to elimination of internal problems, and the different groups of people will not be allowed to engage into conflict with each other. While this is a possibility for some countries, like Finland, Mongolia, Italy, for some like the US, China, or Russia it is not really a possibility. The reason for that is that the US for example is a country made up of people of all sorts of ethnic backgrounds. China has numerous regions where there are other groups of people, but in all of them it is Han Chinese that are majority. In Russia, most of the autonomous regions that have majority of other people groups will not be able to survive on their own.
Learn more about autonomous regions brainly.com/question/4889912
#learnwithBrainly
