Answer:
D. Should Shut Down
Explanation:
A perfect competition firm is at profit maximising equilibrium where : Marginal Revenue [Price] = Marginal Cost .
If MR > MC : Firm's additional production is profitable, it tends to increase production. If MR < MC : Firm's additional production is loss making, it tends to decrease production.
However, If firm's Price i.e MR < Average Variable Cost : The firm's per unit price is even unable to cover it's per unit average variable cost. This situation is referred to as 'Shut Down' point & firm should close down its production in the case.
Given : MR = P = 3 ; MC = 4 ; AVC = 3.5 . The firm's price P (3) is not only lesser by its Marginal Cost MC (4), to decrease production ; but also lesser than its Average Variable Cost AVC (3.5) . So, the firm should shut down.
Answer: Option B and C
Explanation: In simple words , contingent liabilities refers to the liabilities the occurrence of which depends on the happening of an event that may or may not occur in the future.
These are recorded in the accounts only when the payment is to be made in future and that payment could be reasonably estimated.
Hence the correct option is B and C
Answer:
The answer is Credit.
Explanation:
Net loss can be thought of as a <u>Credit </u>to the Capital account.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The GAAP established that when the benefits of obtaining accounting information are lower than the costs of providing that information, the information should not be provided.
For example, sometimes there are very small differences in certain accounts that don't allow a balance sheet to be balanced. If the accounting error is very small, e.g. just a few hundred dollars, then it is not reasonable to have a whole audit team check all the financial statements again to determine what caused the error. An adjusting entry could be made to close the account balances.
Imagine you are an auditor that must check the physical inventory of a factory and some boxes containing supplies are misplaced. It might take you a whole day to count again all the supplies and materials, but is it worth it? If the supplies were really expensive, probably yes, but if they were cheap components, then probably no.
Answer:
$340,000
Explanation:
The computation of Product X’s sales value at the split-off point is shown below:
= Total sales value - Product Y sales value at the split-off point - Product Z sales value at the split-off point
= $600,000 - $150,000 - $110,000
= $340,000
Basically for determining the Product X sales value at the split-off point, we deduct the Product Y sales value and the Product Z sales value at the split-off point from the total sales value
