Answer:
a. Transaction 1
It is not deductible so the Taxable income is $9,000
Transaction 2
It is deductible, taxable income would be;
= 13,500 * ( 1 - Tax)
= 13,500 * ( 1 - 20%)
= $10,800
b. Transaction 1
It is not deductible so the Taxable income is $9,000
Transaction 2
It is deductible, taxable income would be;
= 13,500 * ( 1 - Tax)
= 13,500 * ( 1 - 40%)
= $8,100
Answer:B. Opponents of active stabilization policy believe that significant time lag in both fiscal and monetary policy often excercebate economic fluctuations.
C. Advocate of active stabilization policy believe that the government can adjust monetary and fiscal policy to counter waves of excessive optimism and pessimism among consumers and business.
Examples of automatic stabilizer
A. Corporate income taxes
B. Personal income taxes
Explanation:
Stabilization policy helps to stabilize the economy during expansionary or deficit period however a lag in the implementation will surely affect getting the right outputs from the implementation.
The economy has inbuilt stabilizer s that tend to correct excessiveness in economy such as the personal and corporate tax . The federal fund rate will be adjusted as the need be to stabilizer the economy even though it can be used as a stabilizer but it's not an automatic stabilizer.
Answer:
Expected market return = 9.8%
Explanation:
The expected return on the market can be worked out using the Capital Asset Pricing Model.
<em>The capital asset pricing model is a risk-based model. Here, the return on equity is dependent on the level of reaction of the the equity to changes in the return on a market portfolio. These changes are captured as systematic risk. The magnitude by which a stock is affected by systematic risk is measured by beta.
</em>
Under CAPM, Ke= Rf + β(Rm-Rf)
Rf-risk-free rate (treasury bill rate)- 4.4%
β= Beta - 1.20
Rm= Return on market.- ?
Applying this model, we have
11%= 4.4%+ (R-4.4%)×1.20
0.11-0.044= 1.20×(R-0.04)
0.07
= 1.20R-0.048
Collect like terms
0.07+0.048 = 1.2R
Divide both sides by 1.20
R= (0.07+0.048)/1.20
R=9.83%
Expected market return = 9.8%
Answer:
If Blue ridge decides to purchase the parts instead of manufacturing them, their total costs will increase by $21,300
Explanation:
currently Blue Ridge's costs are:
variable costs = $69,000
fixed costs = $69,000
total $138,000
total cost per unit = $138,000 / 45,000 units = $3.0667 per unit
if Blue Ridge decide to outsource the production of the parts:
variable costs = 45,000 x $4 = $180,000
decrease in fixed costs = $69,000 x -30% = -$20,700
total costs = $159,300
If Blue ridge decides to purchase the parts instead of manufacturing them, their total costs will increase by ⇒ $159,300 - $138,000 = $21,300
This statement is false. The notes receivable account should
only include those notes which can still be collected. Notes that have not
matured yet is still included in the notes receivable account because there is
still the probability of collection. Dishonored notes should not anymore be
included because there is no more probability of collection.
