Both approaches fulfill a need in the market and aim to earn a sustainable profit. The main difference is that social entrepreneurship focuses beyond simply generating a profit, and measures its performance on the positive impact the business makes on society – whether social, cultural or environmental.
Considering the scenario described above, at the store, I am an employee. This is because I'm hired full-time.
Also, because an office manager is supervising me, that shows I am an employee.
Also, given that I work within normal business hours at the store, that is a characteristic of an employee. Again, payment of wages is associated with employee relations.
On the other hand, I work as an independent contractor at the pub because I decide the music to play and get paid per gig.
Also, given that I don't work at normal hours and get paid at a lump sum, this is an independent contractor working feature.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that I worked as an independent contractor at the pub and an employee at the store.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20834227
Answer:
I don't know
Explanation:
Prepare a narrated PowerPoint presentation that will highlight the following items.
a. Your calculations for the amount of property, plant, and equipment and the annual depreciation for the project
b. Your calculations that convert the project's EBIT to free cash flow for the 12 years of the project.
c. The following capital budgeting results for the project:
1. Net present value
2. Internal rate of return
3. Discounted payback period.
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
The firms are expected to maximize profits, the laborers are expected to accept the best offer and the rational consumer is expected to choose the bundle of good that maximizes utility.
Firms will produce the output level where their profits are maximized. The consumer will consume at the level where their total utility is maximized and the laborer will accept the best offer to maximize his benefit.
<span>The researcher has violated participant confidentiality and has made the validity of the study invalid. The people whose confidentiality was breached should be notified and they should have the right to revoke their information from the study. No one who believes they have participated with confidentiality should be subjected to having others know they were involved if they do not want that.</span><span />
