1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
S_A_V [24]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following violates a consumers right to choose

Law
2 answers:
Arisa [49]3 years ago
8 0
There is no explanation
irakobra [83]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

There isnt anything there

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Ronald Rawls and Zabian Bailey were in an auto accident in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Bailey rear-ended Rawls at a stoplight. The
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

I think he can not . I believe that it has nothing to do that if for example  Bailey had a car insurance with Progressive, which means it is  supposed to provide additional insurance  when they are injured by someone who does not have adequate insurance to cover the full  damages. Bailey was negligent In the car accident. Bailey had failed to apply his brakes in time to avoid the collision, failed to turn his vehicle to avoid the collision, failed to keep his vehicle under control, and was inattentive to his surroundings.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
I NEED THE ANSWER TO THIS ASAP PLEASE!!!! When a president rejects a proposed law and sends it back to Congress for reconsiderat
Dmitriy789 [7]
The answer to that is,Letter A “veto”
7 0
3 years ago
How does having three branches of government make our lawmaking process more fair? Make sure to use the phrase “checks and balan
Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. This way, no one branch becomes too powerful. Each branch “checks” the power of the other branches to make sure that the power is balanced between them.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What fear does Madison express in this passage?
Natasha_Volkova [10]
We need the passage first
8 0
3 years ago
Who should determine if, and to what extent, a society is unjust?
Degger [83]

Answer:

if two people are part of a society and one of them has the right to work and earn for himself while the other one is prohibited to do so (i.e. they are unequal before the law), we can safely say that this is an unjust society.

Not the best at law, so i wouldn't completely depend on this^^

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Michael Manin, an airline pilot, was twice convicted of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor. To renew his flight certificati
    15·1 answer
  • A contract was made for 125 bales of cotton to arrive on a ship named "Peerless" from Bombay. Unbeknownst to either party to the
    15·1 answer
  • This branch has Congress, the House of Representatives and the
    6·2 answers
  • What role does the law of supply and demand play in a command economy? A. The law of supply and demand functions the same way as
    5·2 answers
  • Is it illegal to hold a protest on school grounds while school is in session
    15·2 answers
  • Xác định các bộ phận giả định, quy định, chế tài trong các điều luật sau:
    14·1 answer
  • It is against the law to pass when your view of the road ahead is obstructed and when you are within _____ feet of a bridge, via
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the poem racism by E.E Sanyaolu​
    10·1 answer
  • Which one is NOT a misdemeanor?
    12·1 answer
  • If you are convicted of a DUI, this event will have a serious impact on your family. a) True b) False
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!