1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnoma [55]
3 years ago
13

How do you identify employees who have violent potential and how do you deal with them?

Law
1 answer:
spin [16.1K]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

<u><em>i will focus to them of what he do or they do that not know them that i keep watching they do everything.It because i didn't like that kind of ability liying to everyone can't work fairlly it's so unfair.</em></u>

You might be interested in
Describe three aspects of due process for a school seeking to suspend a student with disabilities.
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

Students with disabilities have special schools where they are properly equipped.

Explanation:

As a matter of fact, Why does a school want to suspend a student with a disabiliy?

1.Maybe the student committed a crime.

2.The child's disability is affecting other students.

3.The child is constantly weakened and the environment condition is unsuitable for the child.

I'm not very sure of my answer but..

8 0
3 years ago
What is state ,main components of state and 5 theory of state​
densk [106]
A state is a polity under a system of governance with a monopoly on force. There is no undisputed definition of a state.[1][2] A widely used definition from the German sociologist Max Weber is that a "state" is a polity that maintains a monopoly on the legitimate use of violence, although other definitions are not uncommon.[3][4] A state is not synonymous with a government, as stateless governments like the Iroquois Confederacy exist.[5]
6 0
3 years ago
To which of the following would Kant and Nozick agree?
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

Although Robert Nozick did not consider himself to be primarily a political philosopher, he is best known for his contributions to it. Undoubtedly, Nozick’s work in epistemology and metaphysics (especially with respect to free will and the “closest continuer” theory of personal identity) has had a significant impact on those fields. However, it was the publication of his first book, Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974) that revitalized the political right-wing and set off a firestorm of critical replies and commentaries. While Nozick’s accomplishments reach far beyond the confines of political philosophy, it is safe to say that most recognize him for his work on attempting to provide a justification for the state, setting the limits of government, and trying to convince us that accepting his minimal state could foster a framework for a constellation of communities constituting a sort of utopia.

Anarchy, State and Utopia can also be seen as a critical response to John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, which was published just three years earlier and was considered to be the most robust and sophisticated defense of liberal egalitarianism. Although many credit Rawls for single-handedly rekindling interest in political philosophy, this is likely overstated praise. There is little doubt that Nozick’s systematic criticism of Rawls’ theory of justice and establishment of a rival political theory in Anarchy, State and Utopia also played a major role in bring significant attention back to political philosophy.

8 0
3 years ago
What are the advantages and disadvantages of affirmative action​
xxMikexx [17]
Advantages

Ensures jobs for minorities
It helps disadvantaged individuals with study and job projects.
Disadvantage

It destroys the idea of a meritocracy

It can reinforce stereotypes and racism.
6 0
3 years ago
Detective Stanton gets a tip from John Bratton’s neighbor that Bratton is dealing drugs out of his house. Detective Stanton and
netineya [11]

ANSWER: The exclusionary rule states that any evidence that is obtain illegally, (i.e without a warrant) and any statements obtained through an illegal interrogation, which violate the Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, will not be an acceptable evidence at a criminal trial in the court.

This exclutionary rule applies only to criminal case and not to civil case. Because John Bratton has a murder case charge, which are the dead bodies found in his properties. John Bratton's case is a civil case, and all evidence filed with his case should be admissible in the court of law.

Sara Sutton will not be charged for illegally selling gun, but will be charged for being a sole sponsor of a civil crime case charged against Bratton. This will make Sara Sutton to be prosecuted along side with Bratton, in the case.

If Sara Sutton is charged for illegally selling of guns, it will be a criminal case which will not be admissible by the court, due to exclusionary rule, because the police got their evidence without a search warrant.

John Bratton will not be charged for drug abuse offense, which is a criminal case, because all evidence provided will not be accepted due to exclusionary rule. Stankowitcz has busted into Bratton's apartment without a search warrant.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which laws was passed to regulate unfair competitive practices and practices that deceive or are unfair to consumers?
    8·1 answer
  • How much is law school a year?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a proper general examination practice and/or procedure obeyed to ensure the integrity of the evide
    7·1 answer
  • Another round of bullets hits my skin
    14·2 answers
  • Explain the meaning of plaintiff and defendant by describing their roles in a lawsuit.
    13·2 answers
  • The policy framework and guidelines for community policing state that you should consider 13 interrelated elements to understand
    6·1 answer
  • Emergency number calls can be broadly classified into requests for which three types of
    15·1 answer
  • Why is compromise so important in a democracy?
    9·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
    7·1 answer
  • courts normally follow the rule of stare decisis when deciding cases. there are times, however, as in state v. witt, a new jerse
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!