High standards of living are defined when defining the state of evolution of the society
- in different periods of time considering cultural peculiarities
- comparing two by two of above mentioned states?
- considering the most important standards for a good living
So, we could say japan has a higher state of development then most countries cause techniquely they use their energy most efficiently, being quite a competitive part of the world
Cuba, on the other hand, lacks transparency and coordination in developing strategies , the hedonic needs being preserved and perpetuated by the cubans and the naturalised population, geopolical influences remaining to be looked into.
Client's relating to the psychoanalyst in ways that reproduce or relive important relationships in the individual's life; occurs in psychoanalysis when the analyst begins to assume a major significance in the client's life and the client reacts to the analyst based on unconscious childhood fantasies.
Source:
https://quizlet.com/167510767/therapies-ex-3-flash-cards/
I got LIBERAL. A person who believes that the government should take strong action to prevent unfair practices is a LIBERAL❤
Answer:
Self-regulation
Explanation:
Self-regulation is referred to as the ability to control one's behavior or emotions despite a seemingly terrible situation. The control of emotion is usually geared toward achieving a long term goal. self-regulation is the ability to respond to a situation in a manner and disposition that is socially acceptable and also the ability delay spontaneous reactions like anger
In children, this enables them to direct their own emotions and behavior towards a goal, irrespective of their feelings or the situations they find themselves in.
Darren was displaying self-regulation because he could control his anger and explain to Simon why cheating is bad
I believe the answer is: Biases
The person who made such comments usually had a a really strong preference in one economic system, to the point where that person refuse to acknoweldge the weakness in their preferred view and the strength in the opposing view. This bias could easily be held by all sides.
