I would say a pen and pencil.
Answer:
For me personally I always think of this one tv ad. It was some kind of brand of paper plates.
In the video there's a guy with a generic paper plate of spaghetti and meatballs, and he is holding it with one hand. The weight of the food tilts the plate and it falls off. If he was holding it with 2 hands this wouldn't have happened.
The ad introduces a "deep dish plate" <u>that improves his life</u> by preventing his food from spilling, and the man is now seen with a deep dish paper plate of spaghetti and meatballs, but now he is holding it with 2 hands.
I was annoyed by the ad because, the main problem was less that the food was too heavy for the plate and more that he was holding the plate in an improper manner. He wouldn't have to buy deep dish plates to solve his problem, only make sure he holds his plates correctly.
You'd want to hold the plate on both sides so it doesn't tilt over and spill the contents on the floor.
(I suppose you'd want to use this as an example for your critique, I recommend coming up with your own original work)
Answer:
a. we define ourselves in terms of our membership in certain groups and our differences with people who belong to other groups.
Explanation:
According to social identity theory, people tend to view their own identity by observing other people. After we do the observation, we will notify the group of people that have similarities with us (Such as similarities in status, hobbies, or principles)
After obtaining this information, we will identify ourselves with the group with the most similarities in order to obtain some sense of belonging in that group.
Maturity I believe is the correct answer
Answer:
2. This action constitutes illegal discrimination because the applicant's hearing may be excellent with the help of a hearing aid.
Explanation:
This is most likely what the courts are going to rule when looking at this case. The Americans with Disabilities Act is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability. It also requires covered employers to provide reasonable accomodations for employees with disabilities and imposes accessibility requirements on public accomodations. In this example, the courts are most likely to side with the employee, as the action would only be legal if the disability made it impossible for the employee to perform his job properly. However, the applicant's hearing would not be a problem if he was wearing a hearing device.
